Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 36163 for affidavit of mailing.
Search results 3701 - 3710 of 36163 for affidavit of mailing.
Wisconsin Court System - Electronic payment of court fees
-mail interpreter.info@wicourts.gov, and you will receive a link to proceed with your registration
/services/payment/paymentcip.htm - 2026-05-03
-mail interpreter.info@wicourts.gov, and you will receive a link to proceed with your registration
/services/payment/paymentcip.htm - 2026-05-03
Wisconsin Court System - Electronic payment of court fees
information Information entered in this section will be referenced for any mailings that may occur as a result
/services/payment/paymentsc.htm - 2026-05-03
information Information entered in this section will be referenced for any mailings that may occur as a result
/services/payment/paymentsc.htm - 2026-05-03
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
. In the motion and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Thomas A. Drexler
and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
and supporting affidavits, Drexler maintained that his plea in 1991 was defective because the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5262 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavits. C.C. did not file a response. At the January 11 hearing, CC conceded that the first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
affidavits. C.C. did not file a response. At the January 11 hearing, CC conceded that the first three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=181450 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Minko Lewis
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
for an evidentiary hearing, pursuant to Franks v. Delaware, 438 U.S. 154 (1978), to determine whether the affidavit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4021 - 2017-09-20
Amber L. English v. Virgil Woodworth
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
of fact. If they do, we then examine the moving party’s affidavits to determine whether a prima facie
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15422 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
affidavits, if any, at least 5 days before the time fixed for the hearing.” Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122278 - 2014-09-22
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and voluntarily waive his right to counsel in that case. The motion was supported by a sworn affidavit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21
and voluntarily waive his right to counsel in that case. The motion was supported by a sworn affidavit from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168846 - 2017-09-21
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
this states a claim for violation of § 134.90, Stats. The answer denies the claim. We turn to the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31
this states a claim for violation of § 134.90, Stats. The answer denies the claim. We turn to the affidavits
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31