Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37001 - 37010 of 82355 for simple case.
Search results 37001 - 37010 of 82355 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the felony murder statute in Mason, we did so because the defendant in that case was being sentenced under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
of the felony murder statute in Mason, we did so because the defendant in that case was being sentenced under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90116 - 2012-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 23, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
, ¶35 (“A trial court’s general authority to maintain the orderly and prompt processing of cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
, ¶35 (“A trial court’s general authority to maintain the orderly and prompt processing of cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27853 - 2007-01-22
State v. Lee Norman Brown
N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). Findings of fact concerning the circumstances of the case and the counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14656 - 2005-03-31
N.W.2d 711, 714 (1985). Findings of fact concerning the circumstances of the case and the counsel’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14656 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 14, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
because it was a close case and the prosecutor’s final rebuttal argument, reminding the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
because it was a close case and the prosecutor’s final rebuttal argument, reminding the jurors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27091 - 2006-11-13
State v. Gale Johnson
the case. ¶3 Defense counsel moved for a mistrial or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
the case. ¶3 Defense counsel moved for a mistrial or, in the alternative
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15677 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Adrian E. Stodola
in a light bulb casing and the light bulb was passed around for everyone to smoke from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
in a light bulb casing and the light bulb was passed around for everyone to smoke from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13917 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
to that order, and on July 23, 2007, we issued an order for the case to be submitted for decision, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30132 - 2014-09-15
to that order, and on July 23, 2007, we issued an order for the case to be submitted for decision, stating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30132 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jose G. Araujo
in this case.” The maximum penalty for the disorderly conduct charge was ninety days imprisonment and a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10980 - 2017-09-19
in this case.” The maximum penalty for the disorderly conduct charge was ninety days imprisonment and a fine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10980 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
case. Aundre was born in May of 1997. According to the testimony of Aundre’s social worker, Aundre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20309 - 2014-09-15
case. Aundre was born in May of 1997. According to the testimony of Aundre’s social worker, Aundre
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20309 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jose G. Araujo
conclude that the recommended sentence is appropriate in light of the facts of the case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10980 - 2005-03-31
conclude that the recommended sentence is appropriate in light of the facts of the case. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10980 - 2005-03-31