Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37181 - 37190 of 97585 for court records search online.
Search results 37181 - 37190 of 97585 for court records search online.
[PDF]
NOTICE
, 2007, the court commissioner denied Long’s motion. The April 20 order is not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31331 - 2014-09-15
, 2007, the court commissioner denied Long’s motion. The April 20 order is not in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31331 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Gilles H. Glassiognon
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED December 5, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND RELEASED December 5, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11037 - 2017-09-19
State v. Barry Howard
court's decision to exclude her testimony is moot. With regard to Peterson, the record already contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9583 - 2005-03-31
court's decision to exclude her testimony is moot. With regard to Peterson, the record already contained
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Barry Howard
on the record, we cannot say that the trial court's decision to exclude Parks's and Peterson's testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19
on the record, we cannot say that the trial court's decision to exclude Parks's and Peterson's testimony
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9583 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, and voluntarily entered. The record shows that the circuit court engaged in an appropriate colloquy and made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673301 - 2023-06-28
, and voluntarily entered. The record shows that the circuit court engaged in an appropriate colloquy and made
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=673301 - 2023-06-28
James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
not have been relied on by the court because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
not have been relied on by the court because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13692 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James T. Fritz v. Mary D. Fritz
because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he thought the stipulation was fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13692 - 2014-09-15
because the court did not examine him on the record about whether he thought the stipulation was fair
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13692 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Trenton McAdoo
in Garcia). Here, the record reflects the trial court’s careful consideration of both McAdoo’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13311 - 2017-09-21
in Garcia). Here, the record reflects the trial court’s careful consideration of both McAdoo’s no contest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13311 - 2017-09-21
State v. Trenton McAdoo
omitted; ellipsis in Garcia). Here, the record reflects the trial court’s careful consideration of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
omitted; ellipsis in Garcia). Here, the record reflects the trial court’s careful consideration of both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13311 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the defense both advised the circuit court that Williams had a substantial prior record, and defense counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213878 - 2018-06-04
and the defense both advised the circuit court that Williams had a substantial prior record, and defense counsel
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213878 - 2018-06-04