Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37271 - 37280 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37271 - 37280 of 63360 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion for postdispositional relief. D.J.A.R. argues that the circuit court proceeded under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
motion for postdispositional relief. D.J.A.R. argues that the circuit court proceeded under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194155 - 2017-09-21
State v. Justin Kolp
in denying his motion to suppress.[2] The police found drugs on Kolp’s person during a pat‑down search which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
in denying his motion to suppress.[2] The police found drugs on Kolp’s person during a pat‑down search which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3661 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
discretion. In response, the State argues that by failing to bring a postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160208 - 2017-09-21
discretion. In response, the State argues that by failing to bring a postconviction motion challenging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160208 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jeanette Schwarzbach v. Steven Thelen
and Reese. Judgment granting Thelen’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4107 - 2017-09-20
and Reese. Judgment granting Thelen’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing the action was entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4107 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
erred in denying his motion to suppress eyewitness identification evidence. Upon review, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
erred in denying his motion to suppress eyewitness identification evidence. Upon review, we affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=388506 - 2021-07-13
State v. Dillis V. Allen
. 804.[2] In response to Allen’s discovery demands, the State filed a motion with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
. 804.[2] In response to Allen’s discovery demands, the State filed a motion with the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Romondo D. Seymour
convicting him on six felony counts, and from orders denying his postconviction motions for relief. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
convicting him on six felony counts, and from orders denying his postconviction motions for relief. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7708 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Audell Hernandez
denying his postconviction motions. He contends that he was denied his right to testify because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
denying his postconviction motions. He contends that he was denied his right to testify because he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Morris
motion for postconviction relief. In a series of somewhat vague and disjointed arguments, Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3614 - 2017-09-19
motion for postconviction relief. In a series of somewhat vague and disjointed arguments, Morris
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3614 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Michelle M.
. Michelle filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude from evidence statements she made to Dr. Sherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18237 - 2017-09-21
. Michelle filed a motion in limine seeking to exclude from evidence statements she made to Dr. Sherry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18237 - 2017-09-21