Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 72777 for we.
Search results 3761 - 3770 of 72777 for we.
[PDF]
NOTICE
we conclude that the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and that the transport
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
we conclude that the stop was supported by reasonable suspicion, and that the transport
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34265 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Miyosha K. White
Based on standard canons of statutory construction, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 973. 01(3g), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
Based on standard canons of statutory construction, we conclude that WIS. STAT. § 973. 01(3g), 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7489 - 2017-09-20
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
no right to hold their respective offices.[2] We agree with the trial court’s conclusion. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
no right to hold their respective offices.[2] We agree with the trial court’s conclusion. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4578 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. 2 On counsel’s motion, we granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144685 - 2017-09-21
to the Wisconsin Statutes are to the 2013-14 version unless otherwise noted. 2 On counsel’s motion, we granted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144685 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
the meaning of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., thus entitling him to sentence credit.1 We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
the meaning of § 973.155(1)(a), STATS., thus entitling him to sentence credit.1 We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13904 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Robert Bingen v. Lisa Bzdusek
in the nomination process, and therefore Bzdusek and Johnson had no right to hold their respective offices. 2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4578 - 2017-09-19
in the nomination process, and therefore Bzdusek and Johnson had no right to hold their respective offices. 2 We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4578 - 2017-09-19
Pam Anita Cook v. Roger Paul Cook
and administrative rules to stipulated facts, it is a question of law which we review independently, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9384 - 2005-03-31
and administrative rules to stipulated facts, it is a question of law which we review independently, owing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9384 - 2005-03-31
State v. Kevin P. Sullivan
acts” evidence against Sullivan at the jury trial. Applying current other acts law, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11217 - 2010-02-22
acts” evidence against Sullivan at the jury trial. Applying current other acts law, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11217 - 2010-02-22
State v. Robert Johnson
that asportation is not an element of robbery. We disagree. In 1972, in Moore v. State, 55 Wis. 2d 1, 197 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31
that asportation is not an element of robbery. We disagree. In 1972, in Moore v. State, 55 Wis. 2d 1, 197 N.W.2d
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16979 - 2005-03-31
State v. Thomas J. Trinko
in the prior order for dismissal. Because we must conclude that the reconsideration motion does not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24600 - 2005-03-31
in the prior order for dismissal. Because we must conclude that the reconsideration motion does not present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24600 - 2005-03-31