Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37791 - 37800 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 37791 - 37800 of 83837 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
. Based upon our review of the briefs and the record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174762 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
duplicates untainted evidence, the relative strength and weakness of the State’s case and the defendant’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=89347 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
both of the cases against him with a State recommendation of ten years initial confinement with ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354934 - 2021-04-13
both of the cases against him with a State recommendation of ten years initial confinement with ten
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=354934 - 2021-04-13
Patricia L. Grochowski v. Robert Larson
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8902 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kenneth Korotka
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
of weaknesses in the State’s case, Korotka cites the prosecutor’s statement at a pretrial hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15589 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argument from Madison’s attorney about the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
argument from Madison’s attorney about the mitigating circumstances in this case, including the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86886 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
as the applicability of Dubose is concerned, Dubose was not pending during Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
as the applicability of Dubose is concerned, Dubose was not pending during Brown’s case; trial counsel was not obliged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50284 - 2010-05-24
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 13, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
]ury has spoken,” and again explained the defense theory of the case. Defense counsel then urged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28076 - 2007-02-12
]ury has spoken,” and again explained the defense theory of the case. Defense counsel then urged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28076 - 2007-02-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, the defendant in this criminal case, appeals a circuit court order appointing a special prosecutor. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
, the defendant in this criminal case, appeals a circuit court order appointing a special prosecutor. Based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=910139 - 2025-02-06
[PDF]
Peter J. Steen v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
either the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21
either the owner or the operator. Thus, in the instant case, the trial court concluded that because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12129 - 2017-09-21