Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
City of Appleton v. Paul D. Wink
of physical control over the speed and direction of a motor vehicle while it is in motion. (b) “Operate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15760 - 2017-09-21
of physical control over the speed and direction of a motor vehicle while it is in motion. (b) “Operate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15760 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270840 - 2020-07-21
also appeals from the order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=270840 - 2020-07-21
CA Blank Order
where Johnson made the throwing motion and discovered a handgun on the ground beside a house. Police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91812 - 2013-01-22
where Johnson made the throwing motion and discovered a handgun on the ground beside a house. Police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91812 - 2013-01-22
Tammy Ankomeus v. Mary Irving
in favor of Heritage Insurance Company n/k/a Acuity (Acuity) and from an order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5269 - 2005-03-31
in favor of Heritage Insurance Company n/k/a Acuity (Acuity) and from an order denying their motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5269 - 2005-03-31
State v. Benjay E. Kohanski
and the subsequent denial of his postconviction motions. Kohanski argues that he did not admit, and that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
and the subsequent denial of his postconviction motions. Kohanski argues that he did not admit, and that the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10373 - 2005-03-31
State v. Derrick Wilder
unlawfully stopped him and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
unlawfully stopped him and searched him for weapons. The trial court denied his motion to suppress.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10563 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. RGIS filed a motion to reopen the judgment, which a court commissioner granted. Perkins filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
. RGIS filed a motion to reopen the judgment, which a court commissioner granted. Perkins filed several
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45328 - 2010-01-04
COURT OF APPEALS
erred by denying Lee’s motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at trial; and (4) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
erred by denying Lee’s motions challenging the sufficiency of the evidence at trial; and (4) the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147252 - 2015-08-26
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
modification motion also asked the court to fashion a mechanism for automatically adjusting maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16109 - 2005-03-31
modification motion also asked the court to fashion a mechanism for automatically adjusting maintenance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16109 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
prejudice upon the State’s motion. The present criminal case (with 8 counts) was filed in February 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
prejudice upon the State’s motion. The present criminal case (with 8 counts) was filed in February 2023
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16