Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 37901 - 37910 of 63787 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
to the circuit court on cross- motions for summary judgment on the third claim, which asserted that New Horizon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60798 - 2011-03-07
to the circuit court on cross- motions for summary judgment on the third claim, which asserted that New Horizon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60798 - 2011-03-07
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion, contending Borchardt’s appeal is frivolous and seeking costs and attorney fees. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
filed a motion, contending Borchardt’s appeal is frivolous and seeking costs and attorney fees. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66790 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Credit Union, and the trial court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration. She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30709 - 2007-10-29
Credit Union, and the trial court’s order denying her motion for reconsideration. She contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30709 - 2007-10-29
County of Dane v. Russell A. Williams
, contrary to § 346.69, Stats. Williams also appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14330 - 2005-03-31
, contrary to § 346.69, Stats. Williams also appeals from the circuit court’s order denying his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14330 - 2005-03-31
Johnny Lacy, Jr. v. James LaBelle
to § 146.84(1)(b), Stats. He also sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties filed cross-motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
to § 146.84(1)(b), Stats. He also sought relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The parties filed cross-motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12496 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
] Jared Lowery appeals a circuit court order denying his motion to vacate a conviction for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134414 - 2015-02-04
] Jared Lowery appeals a circuit court order denying his motion to vacate a conviction for operating while
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134414 - 2015-02-04
COURT OF APPEALS
offense) on his no contest plea. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26
offense) on his no contest plea. On appeal, he challenges the denial of his motion to suppress evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142368 - 2015-05-26
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 12, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The City argues that, based on undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27392 - 2006-12-11
its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The City argues that, based on undisputed facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27392 - 2006-12-11
[PDF]
DLK Enterprises, Inc. v. Alan J. Rogers
., the motions for dismissal came after the filing of answers and in conjunction with DLK's motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
., the motions for dismissal came after the filing of answers and in conjunction with DLK's motion for summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9410 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Ozaukee County v. Nancy K. Mutsch
. Counsel for Mutsch brought a pretrial “Motion to Dismiss and to Suppress Evidence Based on Lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12012 - 2017-09-21
. Counsel for Mutsch brought a pretrial “Motion to Dismiss and to Suppress Evidence Based on Lack
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12012 - 2017-09-21