Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 65155 for or b.

State v. Thomas W. Pfeifer
of age, in violation of §§ 346.63(1)(b) and 346.65(c) and (f), Stats., create an irrebuttable mandatory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14466 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Shawn R. Lee
to the Hurlbut report and Lee’s hospital records. It concluded that § 971.14(4)(b), STATS., gives the burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13055 - 2017-09-21

State v. Shawn R. Lee
that § 971.14(4)(b), Stats., gives the burden of proof to the participant who is seeking to disprove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13055 - 2005-03-31

State v. Laura K-T.
of discretion and will be upheld. B. There was sufficient evidence to establish Laura K-T.’s failure to assume
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6407 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
)(a)2.b and § 51.20(1)(a)2.e, respectively. ¶7 D.E.S.’s counsel then argued that the County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=559253 - 2022-08-31

[PDF] Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
an order Full Name JUDGE COURT: Circuit Lower Court. COUNTY: Sheboygan (If "Special", JUDGE: JOHN B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10173 - 2017-09-19

Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
: JOHN B. MURPHY so indicate) JUDGES
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10173 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Laura K-T.
of the evidence was not an erroneous exercise of discretion and will be upheld. B. There was sufficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6407 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Colecta Mireles v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
to the Department for loss of earning capacity benefits, pursuant to § 102.44(6)(b), STATS. The Department’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14105 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Darrell Harding v. Parmod Kumar
- PARTY PLAINTIFF-COUNTERCLAIM-PLAINTIFF- RESPONDENT-CROSS-APPELLANT,† V. BSTV, INC., D/B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15822 - 2017-09-21