Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 50108 for our.
Search results 3801 - 3810 of 50108 for our.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
)(am)4m, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12). 1 Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
)(am)4m, and 939.50(3)(h) (2011-12). 1 Garcia has not responded. Although our initial review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104491 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
our judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
our judgment for that of the jury unless the evidence, viewed most favorably to the State
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131260 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. David Mikel
of rejecting the no merit report as insufficient, we will undertake our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
of rejecting the no merit report as insufficient, we will undertake our independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11017 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
97 CV 415J Anthony D. Taylor v. Rock County Sheriff's Department
5, 1998, using our procedures as they existed before implementation of Act 133. The respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14349 - 2014-09-15
5, 1998, using our procedures as they existed before implementation of Act 133. The respondents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14349 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109922 - 2017-09-21
2 report and our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109922 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119515 - 2014-08-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion. With regard to Siller’s guilty pleas, our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1023117 - 2025-10-14
CA Blank Order
,” the supplier of the drugs. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125185 - 2014-10-21
,” the supplier of the drugs. Upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the record, we conclude at conference
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=125185 - 2014-10-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
sentencing discretion. With regard to Brown’s guilty pleas, our review of the record—including the plea
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1060970 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
disregards our standard of review. A circuit court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135071 - 2017-09-21
disregards our standard of review. A circuit court’s findings of fact are clearly erroneous when
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135071 - 2017-09-21