Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 86725 for affidavit of filing.
Search results 38061 - 38070 of 86725 for affidavit of filing.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence. An amended Information filed after sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109404 - 2017-09-21
’ extended supervision, consecutive to any other sentence. An amended Information filed after sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109404 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. and order (WI App Feb. 15, 2022). Johnson subsequently filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928081 - 2025-03-18
. and order (WI App Feb. 15, 2022). Johnson subsequently filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=928081 - 2025-03-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 Because we conclude that McGinnis’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817814 - 2024-06-25
filed pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 974.06 (2021-22).1 Because we conclude that McGinnis’s claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=817814 - 2024-06-25
CA Blank Order
(2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm. Griswold filed a complaint on June 12, 2009, against town officials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
(2011-12).[1] We summarily affirm. Griswold filed a complaint on June 12, 2009, against town officials
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104394 - 2013-11-12
Donald S. Eisenberg v.
law. REINSTATEMENT OF EISENBERG Opinion Filed: May 8, 1998 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16841 - 2005-03-31
law. REINSTATEMENT OF EISENBERG Opinion Filed: May 8, 1998 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16841 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mai Lee Vue
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
NOTICE A party may file with the Supreme Court a petition to review an adverse decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8798 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Frontsheet
(2021 – unpublished) OPINION FILED: November 4, 2022 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
(2021 – unpublished) OPINION FILED: November 4, 2022 SUBMITTED ON BRIEFS: ORAL ARGUMENT
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=586766 - 2022-11-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement followed by twenty years’ extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
confinement followed by twenty years’ extended supervision. Appellate counsel filed a no-merit appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=245615 - 2019-08-28
Donald S. Eisenberg v.
law. REINSTATEMENT OF EISENBERG Opinion Filed: May 8, 1998 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16850 - 2005-03-31
law. REINSTATEMENT OF EISENBERG Opinion Filed: May 8, 1998 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16850 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement and 22 years of extended supervision.[3] In December 2011, Blecha filed his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94047 - 2013-03-10
of initial confinement and 22 years of extended supervision.[3] In December 2011, Blecha filed his motion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94047 - 2013-03-10