Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 6143 for sheriff.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 6143 for sheriff.
[PDF]
State v. Yeng Vang
County Sheriff’s Department in Minnesota. A Ramsey County deputy informed Von Haden that several local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
County Sheriff’s Department in Minnesota. A Ramsey County deputy informed Von Haden that several local
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5993 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
abused all four children. Michael Weissenberger, an investigator for the La Crosse County Sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10165 - 2017-09-19
abused all four children. Michael Weissenberger, an investigator for the La Crosse County Sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10165 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Background ¶2 A confidential informant told Marinette County Sheriff’s Deputy Rick Berlin that Raminger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27286 - 2014-09-15
. Background ¶2 A confidential informant told Marinette County Sheriff’s Deputy Rick Berlin that Raminger
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27286 - 2014-09-15
State v. Christopher P. Marshall
affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
affirms. ¶2 On May 15, 1999, a Milwaukee County deputy sheriff saw Marshall driving
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4778 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
affidavit affiant, Lafayette County Sheriff Detective Erik Longseth “received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242109 - 2019-06-13
affidavit affiant, Lafayette County Sheriff Detective Erik Longseth “received information from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242109 - 2019-06-13
State v. Leslie M. Haynes
and North 124th Street, the Milwaukee/Waukesha county line. Grabski called the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3262 - 2005-03-31
and North 124th Street, the Milwaukee/Waukesha county line. Grabski called the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3262 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
confinement on February 27, 2023, and asked the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Office to “make arrangements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
confinement on February 27, 2023, and asked the Waukesha County Sheriff’s Office to “make arrangements
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not have the return of the subpoena information from the Sheriff’s department, so he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
not have the return of the subpoena information from the Sheriff’s department, so he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174137 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
County of Jefferson v. Glenn C. Kimpel
disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. Jefferson County Sheriff’s Deputies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
disagree and affirm the judgment. ¶2 The facts are not in dispute. Jefferson County Sheriff’s Deputies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16068 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21
of the suppression decision. He argues that the State failed to show that the arresting sheriff’s deputy had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140332 - 2017-09-21