Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 20931 for word.
Search results 3811 - 3820 of 20931 for word.
COURT OF APPEALS
, was intention[al]? In other words, you intended to do that and you are not contesting that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
, was intention[al]? In other words, you intended to do that and you are not contesting that fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=143768 - 2015-07-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20
., 2004 WI 58, ¶45, 271 Wis. 2d 633, 681 N.W.2d 110. If the meaning of the words of a statute is plain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840099 - 2024-08-20
State v. Daniel Anderson
and place, even a violation of multiple terms is a single transgression. In other words, the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
and place, even a violation of multiple terms is a single transgression. In other words, the act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10225 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Donald R. Davis
.” Defense counsel promptly objected to the State’s use of words. Counsel did not move for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
.” Defense counsel promptly objected to the State’s use of words. Counsel did not move for a mistrial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of conviction. See State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 418-19, 597 N.W.2d 697 (1999). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39560 - 2014-09-15
of conviction. See State v. Curiel, 227 Wis. 2d 389, 418-19, 597 N.W.2d 697 (1999). In other words
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39560 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Heather C.P.
) (emphasis added). In other words, the State maintains that the period of delay excluded from computation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
) (emphasis added). In other words, the State maintains that the period of delay excluded from computation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12049 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words are given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34063 - 2014-09-15
, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except that technical or specially defined words are given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34063 - 2014-09-15
State v. Zong Lor
declined the offer because, in the words of Lor’s affidavit in support of his motion, counsel told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6223 - 2005-03-31
declined the offer because, in the words of Lor’s affidavit in support of his motion, counsel told him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6223 - 2005-03-31
Thomas M. Giebel v. Curt W. Richards
Conroy v. Marquette Univ., 220 Wis.2d 81, 87, 582 N.W.2d 126, 129 (1998) (“The word ‘remote,’ as used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12763 - 2005-03-31
Conroy v. Marquette Univ., 220 Wis.2d 81, 87, 582 N.W.2d 126, 129 (1998) (“The word ‘remote,’ as used
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12763 - 2005-03-31
Columbia County Department of Human Services v. Robert L. W.
, Robert argues that § 48.424 requires the circuit court to use the statute’s “magic words” in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6039 - 2005-03-31
, Robert argues that § 48.424 requires the circuit court to use the statute’s “magic words” in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6039 - 2005-03-31