Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38171 - 38180 of 68499 for did.
Search results 38171 - 38180 of 68499 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
. However, Blicharz did not administer any field sobriety tests to Frohmader due to the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
. However, Blicharz did not administer any field sobriety tests to Frohmader due to the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32694 - 2008-05-13
COURT OF APPEALS
and had gotten kicked out or got out of the truck.” However, she did not know who those people were. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61688 - 2011-03-23
and had gotten kicked out or got out of the truck.” However, she did not know who those people were. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61688 - 2011-03-23
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and is permitted to travel door-to-door. He also contends he did not commit the crime of trespass because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107948 - 2017-09-21
and is permitted to travel door-to-door. He also contends he did not commit the crime of trespass because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107948 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
” and he “could not prove he did not commit [the sexual assault].” The alternate PSI similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609462 - 2023-01-10
” and he “could not prove he did not commit [the sexual assault].” The alternate PSI similarly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=609462 - 2023-01-10
State v. Eesi Vang
court erred when it denied Vang’s motion to suppress the warrant. We conclude that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11477 - 2005-03-31
court erred when it denied Vang’s motion to suppress the warrant. We conclude that the State did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11477 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert E.O.
18 months from the hearing date of 9/24/96. I particularly did not extend the order which otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
18 months from the hearing date of 9/24/96. I particularly did not extend the order which otherwise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13082 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dexter Tolefree
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Harold W. Johnson
making the stop did not have 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14682 - 2017-09-21
making the stop did not have 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14682 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Patricia’s motion to dismiss, subject to certain conditions. The court did not specifically address MVG’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82887 - 2014-09-15
Patricia’s motion to dismiss, subject to certain conditions. The court did not specifically address MVG’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82887 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
twelve–member jury and that in fact he did not know or understand the nature of a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29632 - 2014-09-15
twelve–member jury and that in fact he did not know or understand the nature of a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29632 - 2014-09-15