Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38221 - 38230 of 55819 for n y c.
Search results 38221 - 38230 of 55819 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. Robert T. Barnard
there was reasonable suspicion. See State v. Goebel, 103 Wis. 2d 203, 210 n.3, 307 N.W.2d 915 (1981). Surely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7451 - 2017-09-20
there was reasonable suspicion. See State v. Goebel, 103 Wis. 2d 203, 210 n.3, 307 N.W.2d 915 (1981). Surely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7451 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
John R. Chic v. Foots
Wis.2d 148, 158 n.5, 454 N.W.2d 792, 796 (1990). Nothing NO. 95-3009 4 in the newer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9904 - 2017-09-19
Wis.2d 148, 158 n.5, 454 N.W.2d 792, 796 (1990). Nothing NO. 95-3009 4 in the newer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9904 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986); State v. Krieger, 163 Wis. 2d 241, 249-51 & n.6, 471 N.W.2d 599 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185880 - 2017-09-21
, 266-72, 389 N.W.2d 12 (1986); State v. Krieger, 163 Wis. 2d 241, 249-51 & n.6, 471 N.W.2d 599 (Ct
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185880 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief, see State v. Lagundoye, 2004 WI 4, ¶20 and n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
to file a notice of intent to pursue postconviction relief, see State v. Lagundoye, 2004 WI 4, ¶20 and n
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=61697 - 2011-03-28
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law[.]” Id., ¶19 n.7 (citation modified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059202 - 2026-01-13
because the wrongdoer is clothed with the authority of state law[.]” Id., ¶19 n.7 (citation modified
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1059202 - 2026-01-13
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Electronic Notice N. E. G. Brendan John McEntegart Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
Electronic Notice N. E. G. Brendan John McEntegart Electronic Notice You are hereby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=990110 - 2025-07-30
[PDF]
State v. Patrick R. Bell
that compliance with their request is required.”); see also Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 n.16 (“Only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21
that compliance with their request is required.”); see also Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 19 n.16 (“Only when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12929 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is not automatically entitled to an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Id. at 555, n
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300630 - 2020-11-04
is not automatically entitled to an evidentiary hearing on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Id. at 555, n
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=300630 - 2020-11-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
maximum, not resentencing.4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.13 provides that “[i]n any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90116 - 2014-09-15
maximum, not resentencing.4 WISCONSIN STAT. § 973.13 provides that “[i]n any case where the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90116 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jermaine M. Webb
of his obligation to represent Webb further in this matter. "[A]n appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31
of his obligation to represent Webb further in this matter. "[A]n appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10405 - 2005-03-31