Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38221 - 38230 of 58506 for speedy trial.
Search results 38221 - 38230 of 58506 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53999 - 2014-09-15
there are any material facts in dispute that entitle the opposing party to a trial. Id., ¶24. We view
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53999 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. George Schertz
placement. A hearing was held on June 25 where the trial court dismissed the petition because more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5073 - 2017-09-19
placement. A hearing was held on June 25 where the trial court dismissed the petition because more than
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5073 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
to furnishings, a lawn mower, and a screen door. The matter proceeded to a trial before the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96263 - 2013-05-01
to furnishings, a lawn mower, and a screen door. The matter proceeded to a trial before the small claims court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96263 - 2013-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Jeske
confinement and two years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
confinement and two years’ extended supervision. ¶3 Sentencing is left to the discretion of the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20425 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott I. Collett
on the defendant's freedom imposed by the program, we remand to the trial court for findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11082 - 2017-09-19
on the defendant's freedom imposed by the program, we remand to the trial court for findings of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11082 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Village of Kohler v. John M. Erdmann
with the implied consent law. We disagree and affirm the trial court. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6324 - 2017-09-19
with the implied consent law. We disagree and affirm the trial court. ¶2 The facts are undisputed. On August
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6324 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on the ground that § 948.09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36724 - 2009-06-09
argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to dismiss on the ground that § 948.09
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36724 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
State v. Joseph D. Minkin
). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law this court determines without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6445 - 2017-09-19
). The interpretation of a statute presents a question of law this court determines without deference to the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6445 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
County of Dane v. Steven Spring
alcohol content, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. The parties agreed to a stipulated trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
alcohol content, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a) and (b), STATS. The parties agreed to a stipulated trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10738 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
was entitled to $50,000 from State Farm, representing the policy limit minus Krull’s payment. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28936 - 2014-09-15
was entitled to $50,000 from State Farm, representing the policy limit minus Krull’s payment. ¶6 The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28936 - 2014-09-15