Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38261 - 38270 of 57351 for id.
Search results 38261 - 38270 of 57351 for id.
State v. Geoffrey K. Turk
or she was not free to leave. Id. Would a reasonable person, having been ordered to lie on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13210 - 2005-03-31
or she was not free to leave. Id. Would a reasonable person, having been ordered to lie on the ground
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13210 - 2005-03-31
Michael E. Stoetzel v. Washington County Board of Adjustment
or determination in question. See id. “The facts found by the [board] are conclusive if supported by ‘any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
or determination in question. See id. “The facts found by the [board] are conclusive if supported by ‘any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4911 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in an earlier proceeding. See id. at 682. For a court to conclude an attorney rendered ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211654 - 2018-04-19
in an earlier proceeding. See id. at 682. For a court to conclude an attorney rendered ineffective
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=211654 - 2018-04-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
” and no jury could reasonably find that he had been incapable of forming the requisite intent. Id. at 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28090 - 2014-09-15
” and no jury could reasonably find that he had been incapable of forming the requisite intent. Id. at 9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=28090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
Hart’s arguments and affirmed his conviction. Id. In June 2009, Hart filed a pro se postconviction
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=977902 - 2025-07-02
COURT OF APPEALS
for reasons to sustain the trial court’s exercise of discretion. Id. at 120. ¶5 Rick first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
for reasons to sustain the trial court’s exercise of discretion. Id. at 120. ¶5 Rick first argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38467 - 2009-07-28
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED March 29, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court o...
on facts that were different than those set forth on the instrument. Id. However, courts will not reform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28600 - 2007-03-28
on facts that were different than those set forth on the instrument. Id. However, courts will not reform
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28600 - 2007-03-28
WI App 71 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP001738 Complete Titl...
but in the context of the bond as a whole. See id., ¶21. ¶7 Because the bond in this case is statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63157 - 2012-01-22
but in the context of the bond as a whole. See id., ¶21. ¶7 Because the bond in this case is statutorily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=63157 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
conclusion. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11
conclusion. Id. at 97. Whether a new factor warrants a modification of sentence rests within the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33696 - 2008-08-11