Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 56178 for n y c.
Search results 3831 - 3840 of 56178 for n y c.
[PDF]
State v. Victor Naydihor
[O]n resentencing following a second conviction after retrial, or mere resentencing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4609 - 2017-09-19
[O]n resentencing following a second conviction after retrial, or mere resentencing, the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4609 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
to talk and Jackson replied: “[Y]eah, we can talk.” This post-Miranda interview at the police station
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57751 - 2014-09-15
to talk and Jackson replied: “[Y]eah, we can talk.” This post-Miranda interview at the police station
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57751 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
by the complainant: [Y]ou remember what you said to me—do unto others as you would have them do unto you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
by the complainant: [Y]ou remember what you said to me—do unto others as you would have them do unto you
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15
State v. Timothy Ziebart
the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n.1. We will not overturn a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
the trial court erroneously exercised this discretion. See id. at 320 n.1. We will not overturn a trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carlos Santiago
language card, first in 4 Indeed, while we recognize that “[i]n our diverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
language card, first in 4 Indeed, while we recognize that “[i]n our diverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7862 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
had not touched her anywhere else, though she responded “[y]es” when asked specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749261 - 2024-01-10
had not touched her anywhere else, though she responded “[y]es” when asked specifically whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=749261 - 2024-01-10
State v. Victor Naydihor
at ¶19. ¶27 The Leonard rule provides: [O]n resentencing following a second conviction after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
at ¶19. ¶27 The Leonard rule provides: [O]n resentencing following a second conviction after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4609 - 2005-03-31
State v. Victor Naydihor
at ¶19. ¶27 The Leonard rule provides: [O]n resentencing following a second conviction after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4610 - 2005-03-31
at ¶19. ¶27 The Leonard rule provides: [O]n resentencing following a second conviction after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4610 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ROSALYN Y. HUMPHREY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
. ROSALYN Y. HUMPHREY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. APPEAL from an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56617 - 2014-09-15
Eugene Nichols v. Jon Litscher
. Referring to the 45-day statutory deadline, the court explained that "[b]y requiring prisoners to submit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16369 - 2005-03-31
. Referring to the 45-day statutory deadline, the court explained that "[b]y requiring prisoners to submit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16369 - 2005-03-31