Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38331 - 38340 of 68502 for did.
Search results 38331 - 38340 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Elaine Veasley
the search was illegal because the officer did not have probable cause to arrest her. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
the search was illegal because the officer did not have probable cause to arrest her. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8636 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
informed Millighan that it did not have to follow the sentencing recommendations of his attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135176 - 2017-09-21
informed Millighan that it did not have to follow the sentencing recommendations of his attorney
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135176 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plaintiff had failed to file a brief). ¶12 When the circuit court imposed sanctions, it did so primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
the plaintiff had failed to file a brief). ¶12 When the circuit court imposed sanctions, it did so primarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260478 - 2020-05-19
CA Blank Order
did not wish them to enter the residence. The officers advised they needed to check on the welfare
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91597 - 2013-01-14
did not wish them to enter the residence. The officers advised they needed to check on the welfare
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91597 - 2013-01-14
City of Richland Center v. M&I Bank Southwest
797, 809 n.8, 471 N.W.2d 7, 12 (1991). We conclude that the City did not have a right to immediate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11750 - 2005-03-31
797, 809 n.8, 471 N.W.2d 7, 12 (1991). We conclude that the City did not have a right to immediate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11750 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, deficient for failing to seek a substitution of judge. In the context of explaining why he did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
, deficient for failing to seek a substitution of judge. In the context of explaining why he did not move
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49111 - 2010-04-19
COURT OF APPEALS
proposed new factor, the trial court stated that the record indicated the sentencing court “did not impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20
proposed new factor, the trial court stated that the record indicated the sentencing court “did not impose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99875 - 2013-08-20
State v. Dexter Tolefree
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
and conclude that because he did not raise these issues in his earlier postconviction motion, they are now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10564 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
finding that R.B. did not intend to possess any beer thus defeated his conviction. Id. Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201548 - 2017-11-15
finding that R.B. did not intend to possess any beer thus defeated his conviction. Id. Here
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201548 - 2017-11-15
[PDF]
Paul M. J. v. Dorene A. G.
discretion because (1) it did not follow the guardian ad litem's recommendation; (2) it erroneously ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19
discretion because (1) it did not follow the guardian ad litem's recommendation; (2) it erroneously ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19