Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38341 - 38350 of 69002 for had.
Search results 38341 - 38350 of 69002 for had.
COURT OF APPEALS
qualified as a detention facility under § 51.15(2) and he had been detained there for over seventy-two hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
qualified as a detention facility under § 51.15(2) and he had been detained there for over seventy-two hours
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54754 - 2010-09-22
State v. Richard A. Hoeft
. Supposedly, Hoeft had been taken into federal custody. The State contends that Hoeft was in federal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
. Supposedly, Hoeft had been taken into federal custody. The State contends that Hoeft was in federal custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19759 - 2005-09-26
Nancy M. Keller v. Michael J. Keller, Sr.
for the children.” Nancy did not inform the family court commissioner that the family court had previously entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31
for the children.” Nancy did not inform the family court commissioner that the family court had previously entered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11564 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dillis V. Allen
: 1. That the discovery not be had; 2. That the discovery may be had only on specified terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
: 1. That the discovery not be had; 2. That the discovery may be had only on specified terms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3605 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
did not make or rely on factual findings to determine whether Wieczorek had a reasonable expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
did not make or rely on factual findings to determine whether Wieczorek had a reasonable expectation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101687 - 2013-09-09
State v. Daniel F. Kratochwill
Kratochwill had been previously convicted of a drug offense, the maximum and minimum fines and periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10390 - 2005-03-31
Kratochwill had been previously convicted of a drug offense, the maximum and minimum fines and periods
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10390 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the plaintiffs would not have received a trial on the merits if a mandatory construction had been imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
the plaintiffs would not have received a trial on the merits if a mandatory construction had been imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=88770 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the remaining seven defendants (the Group of 6) had not responded to the complaint. 4 On June 7, the Group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
of the remaining seven defendants (the Group of 6) had not responded to the complaint. 4 On June 7, the Group
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121148 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Peter T.
of the mother, to four children. The children had initially been removed from the parental home on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
of the mother, to four children. The children had initially been removed from the parental home on September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4562 - 2017-09-20
State v. David Lee Miller
in the record to support them. His argument that he was entitled to escape because he had renounced his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2014-06-23
in the record to support them. His argument that he was entitled to escape because he had renounced his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25540 - 2014-06-23