Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 68527 for did.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 68527 for did.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that it agreed with the State and did “n[o]t view this as being mitigated.” The circuit court found that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70792 - 2014-09-15
that it agreed with the State and did “n[o]t view this as being mitigated.” The circuit court found that “[t
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70792 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Lockhart would be unable to make a prima facie case that the court did not comply with the procedural
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161395 - 2017-09-21
. Lockhart would be unable to make a prima facie case that the court did not comply with the procedural
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161395 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Although Melanie was present at the time her attorney consented, the circuit court did not inquire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117453 - 2017-09-21
. Although Melanie was present at the time her attorney consented, the circuit court did not inquire
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=117453 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of its sentencing discretion as long as it did not erroneously exercise that discretion. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
of its sentencing discretion as long as it did not erroneously exercise that discretion. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=363643 - 2021-05-05
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was brief; that this was the first time Adams had appeared in court on this matter (Adams did not appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
was brief; that this was the first time Adams had appeared in court on this matter (Adams did not appear
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248682 - 2019-10-16
State v. James A. Smith
choosing the frequently inconsistent courses of action he did (by repeatedly requesting to discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26318 - 2006-08-28
choosing the frequently inconsistent courses of action he did (by repeatedly requesting to discharge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26318 - 2006-08-28
William McCracken v. Zorka Romanovic
claims court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction to review the court commissioner’s order. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5678 - 2005-03-31
claims court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction to review the court commissioner’s order. Instead
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5678 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
that unsigned change orders did not modify the parties’ agreement and so were unenforceable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104706 - 2013-11-26
City of Menomonie v. Jonathan Skibbe
and because Skibbe eventually turned on his headlights, Bammert did not follow him. Bammert then observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
and because Skibbe eventually turned on his headlights, Bammert did not follow him. Bammert then observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15773 - 2005-03-31
State v. James A. Cundy
and discussing things with him and looking at him and talking with him, did you get the feeling that he was just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4160 - 2005-03-31
and discussing things with him and looking at him and talking with him, did you get the feeling that he was just
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4160 - 2005-03-31