Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 68530 for did.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 68530 for did.
[PDF]
Paul M. J. v. Dorene A. G.
discretion because (1) it did not follow the guardian ad litem's recommendation; (2) it erroneously ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19
discretion because (1) it did not follow the guardian ad litem's recommendation; (2) it erroneously ordered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9029 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
adopted son did not constitute serious permanent disfigurement under the statutes. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67959 - 2014-09-15
adopted son did not constitute serious permanent disfigurement under the statutes. We agree and reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=67959 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
of time. The officer further acknowledged that he did not recall observing any deficiencies with Lehl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95731 - 2013-04-23
of time. The officer further acknowledged that he did not recall observing any deficiencies with Lehl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95731 - 2013-04-23
State v. Timothy Harmon
and that Harmon’s problems “[did] not arise [sic] to [that] level.” The court credited Harmon for taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20971 - 2006-01-17
and that Harmon’s problems “[did] not arise [sic] to [that] level.” The court credited Harmon for taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20971 - 2006-01-17
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
her conviction because the circuit court did not hear her evidence of self-defense. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
her conviction because the circuit court did not hear her evidence of self-defense. State v
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033303 - 2025-11-05
State v. Hosea Wilder
believed that Wilder did not take sufficient responsibility for the offense. However, the court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21787 - 2006-03-15
believed that Wilder did not take sufficient responsibility for the offense. However, the court’s opinion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21787 - 2006-03-15
COURT OF APPEALS
corresponded with the other parties, the County never filed an answer or notice of appearance and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33677 - 2008-08-06
corresponded with the other parties, the County never filed an answer or notice of appearance and did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33677 - 2008-08-06
City of Milwaukee v. Daniel E. Holman
23, 1998 trial date; (2) he did not object to the rescheduling of the trial; (3) the court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14520 - 2005-03-31
23, 1998 trial date; (2) he did not object to the rescheduling of the trial; (3) the court informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14520 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the math for an equal division. Absent a request, the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
the math for an equal division. Absent a request, the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=698623 - 2023-09-06
State v. Lorne Demars
of the repeater allegation because it did not reference the specific convictions providing a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31
of the repeater allegation because it did not reference the specific convictions providing a basis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4011 - 2005-03-31