Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 83508 for simple case search.
Search results 38381 - 38390 of 83508 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
, the case proceeded to trial before a jury in March 2007. At trial, the State introduced testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
, the case proceeded to trial before a jury in March 2007. At trial, the State introduced testimony from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34886 - 2008-12-15
Oneida County v. Sara J.W.
. However, the Act does not apply to this case because the cause of action arose prior to its effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10757 - 2005-03-31
. However, the Act does not apply to this case because the cause of action arose prior to its effective date
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to investigate whether the driver was intoxicated. The State appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123499 - 2017-09-21
to investigate whether the driver was intoxicated. The State appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 The facts in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123499 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
answered “yes” to that question. In the context of the current case, the jury could have answered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252448 - 2020-01-15
[PDF]
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
4 considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2326 - 2017-09-19
4 considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2326 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Robert L. Peterson
agreement to resolve both cases. ¶3 Under the agreement, he pled guilty to one count of misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
agreement to resolve both cases. ¶3 Under the agreement, he pled guilty to one count of misdemeanor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7178 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so, whether there are any material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
the movant has made a prima facie case for judgment and, if so, whether there are any material facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=82287 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Sierra Club v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
list from a related case involving most but not all of the same parties. Consequently, two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21514 - 2017-09-21
list from a related case involving most but not all of the same parties. Consequently, two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21514 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1572 Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV4434
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15