Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 38421 - 38430 of 63981 for records/1000.
Maxim Kleinsmith v. Menard, Inc.
that a copy had been mailed to the court. There was no indication in the record that any answer or appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2154 - 2005-03-31
that a copy had been mailed to the court. There was no indication in the record that any answer or appearance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2154 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
James M. Esselman v. Rosemarie C. Esselman
, James Esselman. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6987 - 2017-09-20
, James Esselman. Because the record supports the trial court’s determination, we affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6987 - 2017-09-20
State v. Lawrence E. Green
unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
unreasonable or unjustifiable basis in the record for the sentence at issue. When reviewing a sentence imposed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21566 - 2006-02-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919693 - 2025-02-25
State v. Curtis A. Moss
and OAS—based on Moss’s driver’s record revocation. The issue before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14358 - 2005-03-31
and OAS—based on Moss’s driver’s record revocation. The issue before us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14358 - 2005-03-31
Frances A. Lease v. William G. Skalitzky
discretionary determinations, we limit our inquiry to whether the trial court considered the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2599 - 2005-03-31
discretionary determinations, we limit our inquiry to whether the trial court considered the facts of record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
3 Burkett’s postconviction motion is not in the appellate records. Although we could summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
3 Burkett’s postconviction motion is not in the appellate records. Although we could summarily
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44702 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be denied without an evidentiary hearing if the record as a whole conclusively demonstrates that relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142461 - 2017-09-21
be denied without an evidentiary hearing if the record as a whole conclusively demonstrates that relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142461 - 2017-09-21
Douglas H. Mellum v. Catherine Ann Mellum
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
a rational decision based on the application of the correct legal standards to the facts of record. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21432 - 2006-02-15
[PDF]
Spencer McClain v. Marianne A. Cooke
the cause to the disciplinary committee, requiring the committee to expunge from McClain’s record all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19
the cause to the disciplinary committee, requiring the committee to expunge from McClain’s record all
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11300 - 2017-09-19