Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 3851 - 3860 of 58285 for speedy trial.
State v. Darrell Cage
from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide and armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide and armed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8524 - 2005-03-31
State v. James D. Curtis
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Curtis raises two issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11094 - 2005-03-31
Van Buren Management, Inc. v. Joseph W. Checota
the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding that Joel S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
the challenged finding of fact. Checota argues that the trial court erred when it made a finding that Joel S
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9239 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). T.K. appeals a trial court order terminating her parental rights to her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546227 - 2022-07-26
in WIS. STAT. RULE 809.23(3). T.K. appeals a trial court order terminating her parental rights to her
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=546227 - 2022-07-26
State v. Matthew L. Abad
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his presentence motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5839 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it denied his presentence motion to withdraw
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5839 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Darrell Cage
of conviction, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide and armed robbery. He raises three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8524 - 2017-09-19
of conviction, after a jury trial, for first-degree intentional homicide and armed robbery. He raises three
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8524 - 2017-09-19
State v. Michael D. Singleton
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
sentence, and an order denying his motion for reconsideration.[1] Singleton claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10470 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael R. Bender
witness to Bender's trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court had the authority to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12356 - 2005-03-31
witness to Bender's trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court had the authority to order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12356 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael D. Singleton
denying his motion for reconsideration.1 Singleton claims that the trial court: (1) failed to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
denying his motion for reconsideration.1 Singleton claims that the trial court: (1) failed to follow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10470 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Bender
transporting the State's primary witness to Bender's trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12356 - 2017-09-21
transporting the State's primary witness to Bender's trial. The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12356 - 2017-09-21