Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 50524 for our.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 50524 for our.
[PDF]
NOTICE
decision denying Evanich’s motion for sentence modification. Our order remanding the matter observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
decision denying Evanich’s motion for sentence modification. Our order remanding the matter observed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34268 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
.2d 667. ¶4 Our review of the record confirms the trial court’s conclusion that Charles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34224 - 2014-09-15
.2d 667. ¶4 Our review of the record confirms the trial court’s conclusion that Charles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34224 - 2014-09-15
State v. Michael T. Schmaling
by the defendant’s criminal conduct.” See United States v. Gibbens, 25 F.3d 28, 34 (1st Cir. 1994). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
by the defendant’s criminal conduct.” See United States v. Gibbens, 25 F.3d 28, 34 (1st Cir. 1994). Although our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8281 - 2005-03-31
State v. David A. Krier
of the important constitutional questions present in our legal system. We conclude that Judge Leineweber had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
of the important constitutional questions present in our legal system. We conclude that Judge Leineweber had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14912 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
A. Probable Cause for the Stop ¶12 Our supreme court has summarized the controlling law as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
A. Probable Cause for the Stop ¶12 Our supreme court has summarized the controlling law as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the circuit court’s sentencing discretion. Upon our independent review of the record, we have found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104665 - 2017-09-21
of the circuit court’s sentencing discretion. Upon our independent review of the record, we have found
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104665 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
there by the detective. Based on our review of the record, including the testimony given at the suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
there by the detective. Based on our review of the record, including the testimony given at the suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
[PDF]
Frontsheet
Discipline Board. The OLR does not recommend imposition of any costs in this matter. ¶11 Based upon our
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104937 - 2017-09-21
Discipline Board. The OLR does not recommend imposition of any costs in this matter. ¶11 Based upon our
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104937 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of sentence credit. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
of sentence credit. Upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this matter
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=362038 - 2021-05-04
[PDF]
State v. Michael R. Weber
was not asserted .… Section 974.06(4), STATS. (Emphasis added.) In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14517 - 2017-09-21
was not asserted .… Section 974.06(4), STATS. (Emphasis added.) In Escalona-Naranjo, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14517 - 2017-09-21