Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 49958 for our.
Search results 38561 - 38570 of 49958 for our.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶2 A convoluted procedural history underlies this appeal. For our purposes, it suffices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142170 - 2017-09-21
. BACKGROUND ¶2 A convoluted procedural history underlies this appeal. For our purposes, it suffices
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=142170 - 2017-09-21
State v. Jacques Gibson
in prison. We disagree. ¶15 The principles governing our review of a court’s sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
in prison. We disagree. ¶15 The principles governing our review of a court’s sentencing decision
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14451 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the sentence would be time served plus costs. Our review of the record does not reveal any indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83435 - 2012-06-06
that the sentence would be time served plus costs. Our review of the record does not reveal any indication
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83435 - 2012-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
exchanged by counsel as the source of the courtesy agreement. Our review of the e-mail indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69118 - 2011-08-09
exchanged by counsel as the source of the courtesy agreement. Our review of the e-mail indicates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=69118 - 2011-08-09
COURT OF APPEALS
in file” is “inaccurate information” as contemplated by our jurisprudence. The first enunciation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
in file” is “inaccurate information” as contemplated by our jurisprudence. The first enunciation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
City of West Allis v. Patrick T. Sheedy
that West Allis has standing to raise the issue, we turn our attention to whether Judge Sheedy had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17192 - 2005-03-31
that West Allis has standing to raise the issue, we turn our attention to whether Judge Sheedy had
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17192 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dorian H.
the scope of our review of a trial court's discretionary act: A court exercises discretion when it considers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9278 - 2005-03-31
the scope of our review of a trial court's discretionary act: A court exercises discretion when it considers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9278 - 2005-03-31
State v. Michael E. Williams
the wrong standard. The trial court's error, however, does not dictate the outcome on appeal because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11062 - 2005-03-31
the wrong standard. The trial court's error, however, does not dictate the outcome on appeal because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11062 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). Our independent review of the record reveals no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
, 70 Wis. 2d 179, 185, 233 N.W.2d 457 (1975). Our independent review of the record reveals no other
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=127099 - 2014-11-05
State v. Carl Simonetto
the written condition and the oral clarification in our analysis.[1] ¶5 We now turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31
the written condition and the oral clarification in our analysis.[1] ¶5 We now turn
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15166 - 2005-03-31