Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38671 - 38680 of 73716 for ha.
Search results 38671 - 38680 of 73716 for ha.
COURT OF APPEALS
explains that its desire to have a drive-thru has no bearing on whether a special use permit was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86044 - 2012-08-09
explains that its desire to have a drive-thru has no bearing on whether a special use permit was required
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86044 - 2012-08-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Electronic Notice You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
Electronic Notice You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=644887 - 2023-04-19
State v. Garry P. Van De Voort
appellate counsel has filed a no merit report pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Van de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10310 - 2005-03-31
appellate counsel has filed a no merit report pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Van de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10310 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
that there was reasonable suspicion, that the person is about to or has committed a crime or, in this case, a traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62149 - 2014-09-15
that there was reasonable suspicion, that the person is about to or has committed a crime or, in this case, a traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62149 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
, WI 53703 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119600 - 2014-08-14
, WI 53703 You are hereby notified that the Court has entered the following opinion and order
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119600 - 2014-08-14
COURT OF APPEALS
for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs: (1) a demonstration that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
for ineffective assistance of counsel has two prongs: (1) a demonstration that counsel’s performance was deficient
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44484 - 2009-12-09
State v. Boyd W. Pigman
that he has no right to refuse an evidentiary test for his blood alcohol content and therefore violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
that he has no right to refuse an evidentiary test for his blood alcohol content and therefore violates
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4360 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. DISCUSSION ¶10 A police officer may conduct a traffic stop when the officer has grounds to “reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109478 - 2014-03-24
. DISCUSSION ¶10 A police officer may conduct a traffic stop when the officer has grounds to “reasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109478 - 2014-03-24
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. No. 2020AP359 4 ¶6 A circuit court may modify child support if there has been a substantial or material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399761 - 2021-07-27
. No. 2020AP359 4 ¶6 A circuit court may modify child support if there has been a substantial or material
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=399761 - 2021-07-27
[PDF]
Joseph N. Francis v. Maureen M. Francis
, to the circumstance where the payor is an executive. Rather, we conclude that Hefty applies where a payor has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21
, to the circumstance where the payor is an executive. Rather, we conclude that Hefty applies where a payor has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16109 - 2017-09-21