Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38741 - 38750 of 67826 for law.
Search results 38741 - 38750 of 67826 for law.
09AP1379 State v. Eric D. Genge
the appropriate discretion when it examines the relevant facts, applies a proper standard of law, uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19
the appropriate discretion when it examines the relevant facts, applies a proper standard of law, uses
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=45888 - 2010-01-19
[PDF]
The Trustee of the Ronald Zuelsdorf and Patricia Zuelsdorf Family Living Trust v. Andrew Hetzel
for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. A decision based on an error of law is an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6640 - 2017-09-20
for an erroneous exercise of discretion. Id. A decision based on an error of law is an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6640 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Iron County v. Ryszard Borys
attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal … was without any reasonable basis in law or equity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16343 - 2017-09-21
attorney knew, or should have known, that the appeal … was without any reasonable basis in law or equity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16343 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102112 - 2017-09-21
to support a claim of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, or law of the case. Per curiam opinions may
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102112 - 2017-09-21
City of La Crosse v. Neil Collins
the application of a legal standard to a set of facts and is therefore a question of law. See Wassenaar v. Panos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13137 - 2005-03-31
the application of a legal standard to a set of facts and is therefore a question of law. See Wassenaar v. Panos
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13137 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of law and fact. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234358 - 2019-02-05
of law and fact. Waukesha Cty. v. J.W.J., 2017 WI 57, ¶15, 375 Wis. 2d 542, 895 N.W.2d 783
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234358 - 2019-02-05
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
allowing him the opportunity to present evidence or argue relevant law; and (3) declined his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79970 - 2014-09-15
allowing him the opportunity to present evidence or argue relevant law; and (3) declined his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=79970 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
) and imposing a joint-and-several restitution obligation. ¶3 Although Wisconsin case law recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40237 - 2014-09-15
) and imposing a joint-and-several restitution obligation. ¶3 Although Wisconsin case law recognizes
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=40237 - 2014-09-15
State v. James C.M.
dispositional order. The State asserts that the trial court's action was lawful under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
dispositional order. The State asserts that the trial court's action was lawful under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14069 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Cory C. Miller
to that section is lawful. Because that standard was not met in this case, the judgment and order are reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10623 - 2017-09-20
to that section is lawful. Because that standard was not met in this case, the judgment and order are reversed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10623 - 2017-09-20