Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3881 - 3890 of 30059 for de.

[PDF] NOTICE
is a question of constitutional law that we review de novo. State v. Tiepelman, 2006 WI 66, ¶9, 291 Wis. 2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31561 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
review its application of a No. 2015AP1589-CR 4 statute de novo. State v. Iverson, 2015 WI
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173983 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] WI APP 33
of private property without just compensation is a question of law that [we] review[] de novo.” Id., ¶35
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138279 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Travelers Indemnity Company of Illinois v. Staff Right, Inc.
on Compensation Insurance. II. ¶8 Our review of a trial court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21745 - 2017-09-21

Village of Slinger v. City of Hartford
relief is a question of law we review de novo. Town of Eagle v. Christensen, 191 Wis. 2d 301, 315, 529
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4579 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Mark R. Lowe
subject to de novo review. State v. Gaulrapp, 207 Wis. 2d 600, 604, 558 N.W.2d 696 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3907 - 2017-09-20

State v. Stanley A. Otis
is a question of law which we review de novo. See State v. Ludwigson, 212 Wis.2d 871, 875, 569 N.W.2d 762, 764
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15800 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law for de novo review. Town Bank v. City Real Estate Dev., LLC, 2010 WI 134, ¶32, 330 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=184491 - 2017-09-21

Paul J. May v. Tri-County Trails Commission
of facts is a question of law which this court reviews de novo, without deference to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12145 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the same methodology as the circuit court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73057 - 2011-11-02