Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38821 - 38830 of 62378 for child support.
Search results 38821 - 38830 of 62378 for child support.
[PDF]
Drug court practitioner fact sheet: Urine drug concentrations -- The scientific rationale for eliminating the use of drug test levels in drug court proceedings
. If the use of urine drug levels cannot be supported scien- tifically, then the validity of decisions based
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/urinedrugoncentrations.pdf - 2021-09-23
. If the use of urine drug levels cannot be supported scien- tifically, then the validity of decisions based
/courts/programs/problemsolving/docs/urinedrugoncentrations.pdf - 2021-09-23
[PDF]
Gaetano Riccobono v. Seven Star, Inc.
. ¶24 Subsequent case law also supports the narrow reading of the holding in Elliott. In DeChant v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14499 - 2017-09-21
. ¶24 Subsequent case law also supports the narrow reading of the holding in Elliott. In DeChant v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14499 - 2017-09-21
Peace Lutheran Church and Academy v. Village of Sussex
-considered and supported by the evidence. The Church appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2962 - 2005-03-31
-considered and supported by the evidence. The Church appeals. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2962 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
opposing the trial court’s factual findings but for evidence in support. Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295151 - 2020-10-14
opposing the trial court’s factual findings but for evidence in support. Royster-Clark, Inc. v. Olsen’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=295151 - 2020-10-14
[PDF]
WI APP 108
there were discussions over depositions in December 2007, but this is not supported by her record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51562 - 2014-09-15
there were discussions over depositions in December 2007, but this is not supported by her record citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51562 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
). On the contrary, “if a disagreement between parties as to their intent could support a claim of indefiniteness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970280 - 2025-06-17
). On the contrary, “if a disagreement between parties as to their intent could support a claim of indefiniteness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=970280 - 2025-06-17
[PDF]
filed a proper and “reasonable” motion to dismiss, which was “supported by the law.” When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
filed a proper and “reasonable” motion to dismiss, which was “supported by the law.” When
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882101 - 2024-11-27
State v. Michael R. Sturgeon
The trial court rejected Sturgeon’s plea withdrawal motion. In support, the court cited to the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14596 - 2005-03-31
The trial court rejected Sturgeon’s plea withdrawal motion. In support, the court cited to the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14596 - 2005-03-31
WI App 112 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP2254 Complete Title o...
, because it lacks sufficient support from the record. We affirm. I. Background. ¶2 Due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65775 - 2011-07-25
, because it lacks sufficient support from the record. We affirm. I. Background. ¶2 Due
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65775 - 2011-07-25
State v. Barbara A. Buettner
. Buettner’s brief was entitled “Brief in Support of Postconviction Relief.” It requested an expansion of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31
. Buettner’s brief was entitled “Brief in Support of Postconviction Relief.” It requested an expansion of time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31