Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38821 - 38830 of 62015 for child support.

[PDF]
, and that the arrest was unlawful because it was not supported by probable cause. Although Brown later suggested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=882435 - 2024-11-27

State v. Clarence Givens
evidence to support his conviction for one of the delivery counts; and that the trial court’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12420 - 2005-03-31

State v. Leah B. Hensiak
, that she had very little community support and that she therefore presented a moderate to high risk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5802 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
motion, following a nonevidentiary hearing. In support of its decision, the court stated, “[T]he facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135537 - 2015-02-23

[PDF]
confrontational. And with … an unwillingness to seek support.” The court stated: “I find
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=355057 - 2021-04-07

2007 WI APP 133
amount of damages, and we affirm. The Oregon court’s decision supports Symantec’s claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28773 - 2007-07-11

[PDF] WI APP 200
, 111 Wis. 2d 584, 331 N.W.2d 598 (Ct. App. 1983), supports his position that “seasonal dwellings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29821 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
phone evidence.” In support of this claim, Tappa asserted he would prove during an evidentiary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=511880 - 2022-04-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
with counsel to provide false testimony. He argues that the prosecutor’s assertion was not supported by any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=617626 - 2023-02-02

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
an incriminating response from Yang. Yang’s argument is not supported by the record. ¶27 Nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93377 - 2014-09-15