Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 38871 - 38880 of 68517 for did.
Search results 38871 - 38880 of 68517 for did.
State v. Walter B. Cowan
omissions as failure to object to inadmissible hearsay at trial and at sentencing. However, the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7800 - 2005-03-31
omissions as failure to object to inadmissible hearsay at trial and at sentencing. However, the motion did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7800 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Steven Richard Evans
checking – or I’ll check you first.” Evans did not verbally respond, but turned around and placed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16300 - 2017-09-21
checking – or I’ll check you first.” Evans did not verbally respond, but turned around and placed his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16300 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI 127
: Dissented: Not Participating: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27207 - 2006-11-19
: Dissented: Not Participating: ROGGENSACK, J., did not participate. Attorneys
/sc/dispord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27207 - 2006-11-19
CA Blank Order
that the court did not adequately explain the sentence it imposed so as to allow meaningful appellate review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
that the court did not adequately explain the sentence it imposed so as to allow meaningful appellate review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97124 - 2013-05-21
Paul F. Ramsey v. Robert P. Ellis
conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Ramsey also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7783 - 2005-03-31
conclude the court did not erroneously exercise its discretion. Ramsey also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7783 - 2005-03-31
State v. Ferdinand Walters
). Walters contends that: (1) the trial court did not consider his motion on its merits; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
). Walters contends that: (1) the trial court did not consider his motion on its merits; and (2) he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10796 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joseph McGowan
days credit than previously awarded. We conclude, as did the trial court, that McGowan has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5667 - 2005-03-31
days credit than previously awarded. We conclude, as did the trial court, that McGowan has failed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5667 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 3, 2007 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of Ap...
of extended supervision. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2007-01-02
of extended supervision. Postconviction, Melenciano moved to withdraw his plea because the circuit court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27635 - 2007-01-02
[PDF]
State v. Harry Moore
evidence. We conclude the court did not err, and we affirm. No. 99-1555-CR 2 ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15640 - 2017-09-21
evidence. We conclude the court did not err, and we affirm. No. 99-1555-CR 2 ¶2 The facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15640 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
to correct a manifest injustice. Green did not raise this issue in the circuit court. To the contrary, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101055 - 2013-08-25
to correct a manifest injustice. Green did not raise this issue in the circuit court. To the contrary, he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=101055 - 2013-08-25