Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39051 - 39060 of 64027 for records/1000.

[PDF] Community Credit Plan, Inc. v. Marcia K. Johnson
, and consequently the majority in this case, incorrectly relied on facts not supported by the record
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17218 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
undertaking in which the panel is required to restrict its decision to the facts appearing of record.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683505 - 2023-07-27

[PDF] Barron County v. Kathy S.
after 1990, and she therefore had ample notice and time to comply. The record also reflects
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15971 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] H.D. Enterprises II, LLC v. City of Stoughton
was listed as “licenses.” It does not appear from the record that the opponents of the license who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14714 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
a response. We have independently reviewed the record and the no- merit report as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152304 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
after she had grabbed his arm. (Record citations omitted.) We agree. ¶17 During
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40509 - 2009-09-08

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the several periods that the court had to go off the record to resolve the confusion, Willis was persuaded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218126 - 2018-08-28

Keric T. Dechant v. Monarch Life Insurance Company
in such a manner and further conclude that the factual record supports the trial court's choice. We affirm its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7707 - 2005-03-31

All City Communication Company, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Department of Revenue
such findings are “not supported by substantial evidence in the record.” Wis. Stat. § 227.57(6) (2001-02
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5222 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. “Whether the record conclusively demonstrates that the defendant is entitled to no relief is also
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=967483 - 2025-06-10