Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39061 - 39070 of 82353 for simple case.
Search results 39061 - 39070 of 82353 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
be done at a de novo hearing, I think there is case law that suggests a de novo hearing is de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
be done at a de novo hearing, I think there is case law that suggests a de novo hearing is de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35709 - 2009-03-03
State v. Jamie S.
be contrary to the best interests of the child or of the public to hear the case, the judge shall enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
be contrary to the best interests of the child or of the public to hear the case, the judge shall enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11739 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Postconviction counsel proceeded to evaluate Olson’s case. Subsequently, counsel moved to withdraw at Olson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35711 - 2014-09-15
Postconviction counsel proceeded to evaluate Olson’s case. Subsequently, counsel moved to withdraw at Olson’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35711 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118620 - 2014-08-05
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118620 - 2014-08-05
[PDF]
State v. Robert J. Smokovich
was speaking with the driver and Smokovich, Fixel noticed a case between Smokovich’s feet. After the driver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5871 - 2017-09-19
was speaking with the driver and Smokovich, Fixel noticed a case between Smokovich’s feet. After the driver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5871 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case. We affirm. ¶2 The facts are not disputed. The County, through its highway department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71990 - 2014-09-15
of this case. We affirm. ¶2 The facts are not disputed. The County, through its highway department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=71990 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 7, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
case on claim preclusion grounds.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
case on claim preclusion grounds.[1] Because the trial court properly exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27042 - 2006-11-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097395 - 2026-03-31
for relief. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1097395 - 2026-03-31
Jeffrey Daggett v. Wisconsin Electric Power Company
. This is a “stray voltage” case. Jeffrey and Denise Daggett appeal from a judgment dismissing their action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8804 - 2005-03-31
. This is a “stray voltage” case. Jeffrey and Denise Daggett appeal from a judgment dismissing their action against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8804 - 2005-03-31
Hoppe Builders, Inc. v. Shaun L. Moersfelder
) Moersfelder did not establish a prima facie case of negligence; (2) the trial court erred in awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8096 - 2005-03-31
) Moersfelder did not establish a prima facie case of negligence; (2) the trial court erred in awarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8096 - 2005-03-31