Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 58499 for speedy trial.
Search results 3911 - 3920 of 58499 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. William S. Purdy
zone. He contends that he was improperly denied a jury trial, that he was denied a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4006 - 2017-09-20
zone. He contends that he was improperly denied a jury trial, that he was denied a fair trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4006 - 2017-09-20
State v. William S. Purdy
in a fifty-five-mile-per-hour zone. He contends that he was improperly denied a jury trial, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4006 - 2005-03-31
in a fifty-five-mile-per-hour zone. He contends that he was improperly denied a jury trial, that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4006 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Jon Jurkovic
an automobile while intoxicated, as a fourth offense. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). That was his second trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5859 - 2005-03-31
an automobile while intoxicated, as a fourth offense. See Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a). That was his second trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5859 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. The issue is whether the trial court misconstrued Guman’s sentence modification motion based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50285 - 2010-04-26
. The issue is whether the trial court misconstrued Guman’s sentence modification motion based on a new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50285 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
Metcalf, Jr., and set maintenance and child support. Gina contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31967 - 2014-09-15
Metcalf, Jr., and set maintenance and child support. Gina contends that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31967 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
contends that the trial court erred in finding that Thomas’s interest in Metcalf Farms Partnership II (MFP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31967 - 2008-02-27
contends that the trial court erred in finding that Thomas’s interest in Metcalf Farms Partnership II (MFP
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31967 - 2008-02-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it permitted him to represent himself, and he asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59523 - 2014-09-15
. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it permitted him to represent himself, and he asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59523 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Johnson & Son, Inc. (SCJ).1 DeGuelle argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97753 - 2014-09-15
. Johnson & Son, Inc. (SCJ).1 DeGuelle argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97753 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
. (SCJ).[1] DeGuelle argues that the trial court improperly limited discovery and granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04
. (SCJ).[1] DeGuelle argues that the trial court improperly limited discovery and granted summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=97753 - 2013-06-04
COURT OF APPEALS
. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it permitted him to represent himself, and he asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2005-03-31
. Brown claims that the trial court erred when it permitted him to represent himself, and he asks us
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2005-03-31