Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39131 - 39140 of 69101 for as he.
Search results 39131 - 39140 of 69101 for as he.
State v. Anthony Lee Tucker
grams. He received 18 months and 6 years respectively, concurrent. Tucker was also charged in Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
grams. He received 18 months and 6 years respectively, concurrent. Tucker was also charged in Waukesha
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6602 - 2005-03-31
State v. David Scott Mathis
arising from his refusal to submit to an implied consent blood alcohol test. He argues that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3074 - 2005-03-31
arising from his refusal to submit to an implied consent blood alcohol test. He argues that the notice
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3074 - 2005-03-31
State v. Johnny Rainey
for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26293 - 2006-08-29
for postconviction relief. He argues on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion alleging
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26293 - 2006-08-29
COURT OF APPEALS
with threat of force and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40702 - 2009-09-15
with threat of force and from the order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He contends he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=40702 - 2009-09-15
James A. Kirner v. Roland and Sheila Froese
that the Froeses’ predecessor-in-title, Calvin Schneller, had the requisite hostile intent because he used the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2005-03-31
that the Froeses’ predecessor-in-title, Calvin Schneller, had the requisite hostile intent because he used the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12860 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Teresa M. Lippert v. Thomas J. Lippert
understandable manner. He appears to argue that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8725 - 2017-09-19
understandable manner. He appears to argue that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8725 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
trial. He claims that: (1) the court erred in admitting testimony that the victim had told her mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51500 - 2014-09-15
trial. He claims that: (1) the court erred in admitting testimony that the victim had told her mother
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=51500 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
him relief that he has yet to receive in the subsequent PRC reviews.” Id., ¶12. Richards argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110890 - 2014-04-22
him relief that he has yet to receive in the subsequent PRC reviews.” Id., ¶12. Richards argues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110890 - 2014-04-22
State v. William L. Tinder
under the influence of an intoxicant. He suggests that the circuit court erred in denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31
under the influence of an intoxicant. He suggests that the circuit court erred in denying his motions
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3713 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Reginald D. Burke v. Gary McCaughtry
that prison officials did not show his guilt by sufficient evidence. He claims that anyone could have put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14274 - 2014-09-15
that prison officials did not show his guilt by sufficient evidence. He claims that anyone could have put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14274 - 2014-09-15