Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39161 - 39170 of 83087 for simple case search.
Search results 39161 - 39170 of 83087 for simple case search.
COURT OF APPEALS
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
deficiency. The court reasoned that, given the facts of the case, there was reasonable suspicion to extend
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103040 - 2013-10-14
[PDF]
Fred Wessel v. Brian Schmidlin
to meet the needs of a particular case, including in a corporate setting. See Prince v. Bryant, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
to meet the needs of a particular case, including in a corporate setting. See Prince v. Bryant, 87 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6914 - 2017-09-20
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
review of the briefs and Record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112478 - 2014-05-12
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1028178 - 2025-10-29
[PDF]
NOTICE
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction for filing a frivolous appeal. We agree the present
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31175 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
and that pertaining to the remaining count; and (3) the strength of the case on the remaining count. Id. at 379-80. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86696 - 2012-09-04
[PDF]
State v. Floyd A. Worth
in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation, Worth points to two remarks he made during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
in this case. Maintaining that he did indeed reject probation, Worth points to two remarks he made during
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13191 - 2017-09-21
State v. William H. Thornton, Jr.
affirmed on appeal. ¶4 In June 1997, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided the Howard case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3997 - 2005-03-31
affirmed on appeal. ¶4 In June 1997, the Wisconsin Supreme Court decided the Howard case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3997 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Brad E. Glaunert
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19
. ¶12 The matter proceeded to a two-day jury trial in June 2002. At the close of the State’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5873 - 2017-09-19