Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 58285 for speedy trial.
Search results 3921 - 3930 of 58285 for speedy trial.
COURT OF APPEALS
for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court actually relied on inaccurate information when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34703 - 2008-11-24
for resentencing. The issues are whether the trial court actually relied on inaccurate information when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34703 - 2008-11-24
[PDF]
State v. John W. Moore
of the bank, disturbing other people in the lobby area. Moore had a trial to the court on June 24, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14546 - 2017-09-21
of the bank, disturbing other people in the lobby area. Moore had a trial to the court on June 24, 1998
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14546 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Gwen Ann Franzen v. Richard Leroy Franzen
-1007 2 Vic’s). Richard argues that the trial court’s valuation of Rick & Vic’s was contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5154 - 2017-09-19
-1007 2 Vic’s). Richard argues that the trial court’s valuation of Rick & Vic’s was contrary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5154 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
motion. Stewart contends that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the State failed to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
motion. Stewart contends that he is entitled to a new trial because: (1) the State failed to disclose
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55960 - 2010-10-27
[PDF]
Village of Thiensville v. Jon R. Olsen
intoxicated case, maintains that before the trial court can exercise its authority to reconsider on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
intoxicated case, maintains that before the trial court can exercise its authority to reconsider on its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14276 - 2014-09-15
Maria Margaret Cook v. Lenora Brockman, M.D.
against her. Brockman argues that the trial court’s grant of a default judgment constituted an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2783 - 2005-03-31
against her. Brockman argues that the trial court’s grant of a default judgment constituted an erroneous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2783 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Kelly Scott Roberts
to support the verdict of guilty; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8228 - 2017-09-19
to support the verdict of guilty; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in denying him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8228 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with directions. No. 2017AP2272-CR 2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. 1 The State appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231886 - 2019-01-15
with directions. No. 2017AP2272-CR 2 ¶1 DUGAN, J. 1 The State appeals from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=231886 - 2019-01-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
pornography. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it required him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15
pornography. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it required him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36460 - 2014-09-15
Noah Filppula-McArthur v. Thomas Halloin, M.D.
Ball and revoking his pro hac vice admission. The McArthurs additionally appeal from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15341 - 2005-03-31
Ball and revoking his pro hac vice admission. The McArthurs additionally appeal from the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15341 - 2005-03-31