Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39331 - 39340 of 46948 for show's.
Search results 39331 - 39340 of 46948 for show's.
COURT OF APPEALS
violation, “the defendant must show that … the evidence was favorable to the defendant and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
violation, “the defendant must show that … the evidence was favorable to the defendant and that the evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
[PDF]
State v. John C. Johnson
of the results to show probable cause for arrest. Given that the failure to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19
of the results to show probable cause for arrest. Given that the failure to perform field sobriety tests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2276 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Tyrone Jackson
prior record shows conviction dates for at least one felony and five misdemeanors, all occurring within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9180 - 2017-09-19
prior record shows conviction dates for at least one felony and five misdemeanors, all occurring within
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9180 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(reviewing a decision regarding proposed modification of custody or placement that also required a showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
(reviewing a decision regarding proposed modification of custody or placement that also required a showing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=954933 - 2025-05-13
Raymond L. Harwick v. Robert F. Black
must show that the disputed property was used for the requisite period of time in an “open, notorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14762 - 2005-03-31
must show that the disputed property was used for the requisite period of time in an “open, notorious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14762 - 2005-03-31
State v. David L. Shaw
there is a reasonable expectation that the witness can be located. Where a satisfactory showing is made with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10507 - 2005-03-31
there is a reasonable expectation that the witness can be located. Where a satisfactory showing is made with respect
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10507 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
David J. Barkow v. Matthew J. Ciesielczyk
. The declarations page showed that a separate premium for each vehicle was charged; the liability premium
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9481 - 2017-09-19
. The declarations page showed that a separate premium for each vehicle was charged; the liability premium
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9481 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Donald Doering v. Sam Kaufman
his “best interest” argument, Doering would be required to show that Kaufman did not act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12213 - 2017-09-21
his “best interest” argument, Doering would be required to show that Kaufman did not act
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12213 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert H. Miller
. In Biddings, the court concluded that the defendant failed to show that he had an honestly held religious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5742 - 2005-03-31
. In Biddings, the court concluded that the defendant failed to show that he had an honestly held religious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5742 - 2005-03-31
State v. Christopher L. Berry
, No. 92-3139-CR, unpublished slip op. at 8-9 (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 1993), the evidence showed that Berry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4697 - 2005-03-31
, No. 92-3139-CR, unpublished slip op. at 8-9 (Wis. Ct. App. Sept. 1, 1993), the evidence showed that Berry
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4697 - 2005-03-31