Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 83389 for simple case search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 83389 for simple case search.
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
has misinterpreted the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7128 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael G.
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
in this case is transparent and puerile. We also caution counsel that recitation of “facts” without citation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12566 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
this case for further proceedings. Background ¶2 On March 10, 2005, Aubry was travelling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
this case for further proceedings. Background ¶2 On March 10, 2005, Aubry was travelling southbound
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32731 - 2008-05-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
what a reasonable officer could infer from this response. ¶6 To begin, the cases cited
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=264840 - 2020-06-18
[PDF]
Jennie K. Vasen v. Progressive Insurance Companies
consider Vasen’s summary judgment motion. Vasen, as moving plaintiff, must show a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21
consider Vasen’s summary judgment motion. Vasen, as moving plaintiff, must show a prima facie case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16166 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
. Affirmed. Background ¶2 Kay & Kay represented Stangler in two separate cases and billed legal fees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141299 - 2015-05-05
[PDF]
NOTICE
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
claim’s viability. We agree. We reverse the judgment and remand this case for further proceedings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32731 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
for the State. At the time she testified, Isenhart had six criminal charges pending—also, like Howland’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74965 - 2011-12-13
for the State. At the time she testified, Isenhart had six criminal charges pending—also, like Howland’s case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74965 - 2011-12-13