Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39341 - 39350 of 84004 for simple case search.

State v. Michael L. Sellers
for joinder and the case was tried to a jury. The jury convicted Sellers of the battery stemming from the May
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9319 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
understand this case to be controlled by WIS. STAT. § 48.426(2), which states: The best interests
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3024 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105185 - 2013-12-02

Susan Bauer v. Village of DeForest
decisions cited as authority the case of Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis. 2d 717, 541 N.W.2d 198 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4132 - 2005-03-31

State v. Monica L. Graham
with State v. Biljan, 177 Wis.2d 14, 501 N.W.2d 820 (Ct. App. 1993).[2] But the cases are not irreconcilable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9141 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
the undisputed and fully briefed facts of this case to determine if probable cause existed at the time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145595 - 2015-08-04

Walworth County Department of Health & Human Services v. Carl H.
requiring statutory interpretation, our review is de novo. We understand this case to be controlled by Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3024 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary A. Malkmus
. The court additionally found that one of the case files that was to be settled during that plea hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11446 - 2017-09-19

Samuels Recycling Company v. Continental Casualty Company
, in certain cases “‘[t]he policy reasons for allowing an exception [to claim preclusion] override the policy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21710 - 2006-03-08

[PDF] State v. Cheryl Braun
In this case, the record reflects considerable confusion about what actually was being litigated. Initially
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8823 - 2017-09-19