Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39431 - 39440 of 69399 for as he.

Deborah K. Deforth v. Gary L. Deforth
Deborah Deforth. He contends that the circuit court’s division of property was an erroneous exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25547 - 2006-06-14

[PDF] Kimberly Area School District v. Susan Zdanovec
for the parents of three of Zdanovec's students. Spitzer-Resnick indicated that he intended to file a federal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13763 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Oral Argument Synopses - November 2020
the address at which he will be residing when he was unable to provide this information.” In March 2016
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=304602 - 2020-11-11

[PDF] Jeff S. Schmeling v. Richard J. Phelps
because: (1) his veto is a discretionary act for which he is immune from suit under § 893.80(4), STATS
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11431 - 2017-09-19

Duane S. Jorgensen v. Water Works, Inc.
oversee management as long as he lived. Payments were made to every shareholder once a week since 1989
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12626 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
2 alcohol concentration. He subsequently filed a request for a refusal hearing, but did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98528 - 2017-09-21

Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
placement of his son William.[1] He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25088 - 2006-06-27

Frontsheet
intoxicated and apparently refused a chemical test to ascertain his blood alcohol concentration. He
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98528 - 2013-07-30

[PDF] Wendy Pero v. Donald Lucas
of his son William. 1 He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25088 - 2017-09-21

State v. Marvin L. Hereford
. He appeals on these grounds: (1) the trial court misused its discretion and erred as a matter of law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7922 - 2005-03-31