Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 41612 for she's.
Search results 3951 - 3960 of 41612 for she's.
Nancy Koch v. P. A. Bergner & Company
incorrectly concluded that she failed to prove special damages. We reject Koch's arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9163 - 2005-03-31
incorrectly concluded that she failed to prove special damages. We reject Koch's arguments and affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9163 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 During the jury trial, K.N. testified that she was walking down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157695 - 2017-09-21
of trial counsel. We affirm. ¶2 During the jury trial, K.N. testified that she was walking down
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=157695 - 2017-09-21
Roger R. Bjork v. Carol Bjork
dividing the parties’ property. She argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15603 - 2005-03-31
dividing the parties’ property. She argues that the trial court improperly exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
claim that she wanted to represent herself at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188182 - 2017-09-21
claim that she wanted to represent herself at trial. Based upon our review of the briefs and record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=188182 - 2017-09-21
CA Blank Order
states that trial counsel moved to dismiss the count at various times, but she does not provide record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100457 - 2013-08-06
states that trial counsel moved to dismiss the count at various times, but she does not provide record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100457 - 2013-08-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a mistrial after B.H. testified multiple times during in-person trial testimony that she could not remember
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255690 - 2020-03-05
for a mistrial after B.H. testified multiple times during in-person trial testimony that she could not remember
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255690 - 2020-03-05
[PDF]
WI App 84
in October 2019. M.S. testified that she still owned the pick-up truck and that it was “parked right now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453545 - 2022-01-13
in October 2019. M.S. testified that she still owned the pick-up truck and that it was “parked right now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453545 - 2022-01-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that earlier that evening she had confronted Brabazon at her residence about some jewelry missing from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94617 - 2014-09-15
that earlier that evening she had confronted Brabazon at her residence about some jewelry missing from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94617 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
.] will tell you she came home from work. The defendant was angry, indicated he had hit [V.G.], that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20
.] will tell you she came home from work. The defendant was angry, indicated he had hit [V.G.], that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140015 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
WI App 57
. Specifically, Zahurones argues she is entitled to credit on Count 2 for time she spent in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07
. Specifically, Zahurones argues she is entitled to credit on Count 2 for time she spent in custody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=246423 - 2019-11-07