Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 39521 - 39530 of 77007 for judgment for u s.
Search results 39521 - 39530 of 77007 for judgment for u s.
Frontsheet
matter while working from prison. ¶6 Upon J.M.'s release from prison in May 2002, Attorney Compton
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
matter while working from prison. ¶6 Upon J.M.'s release from prison in May 2002, Attorney Compton
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31515 - 2008-01-15
COURT OF APPEALS
), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).[2] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04
), and Miller v. Alabama, ___ U.S. ___, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012).[2] We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 In 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=118824 - 2014-08-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the same challenge to Juror 22’s “extraneous information” that he raised in Johnson II). Johnson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
the same challenge to Juror 22’s “extraneous information” that he raised in Johnson II). Johnson
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
State v. Ying N.V.
in the serious juvenile offender program under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31
in the serious juvenile offender program under s. 938.538 or the adult intensive sanctions program under s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5722 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Chadwick Timothy Graef, Respondent, Christopher S. Carson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35258 - 2009-01-20
, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Chadwick Timothy Graef, Respondent, Christopher S. Carson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35258 - 2009-01-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, is sufficient to revoke [Adams’s] supervised release…. I find that the [S]tate has proven by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
, is sufficient to revoke [Adams’s] supervised release…. I find that the [S]tate has proven by clear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=722015 - 2023-10-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is satisfied. If you find that there is a substantial likelihood, based on [Michael B.’s] treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59693 - 2011-02-07
is satisfied. If you find that there is a substantial likelihood, based on [Michael B.’s] treatment record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59693 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
Wood County Dept. of Social Services v. Mabel R.
. NO. 2005AP851 IN THE INTEREST OF TRACEY S. R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19427 - 2017-09-21
. NO. 2005AP851 IN THE INTEREST OF TRACEY S. R., A PERSON UNDER THE AGE OF 18: WOOD COUNTY DEPARTMENT
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19427 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
the same challenge to Juror 22’s “extraneous information” that he raised in Johnson II). Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
the same challenge to Juror 22’s “extraneous information” that he raised in Johnson II). Johnson
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070443 - 2026-02-03
[PDF]
Acknowledgement of Filing of Brief (Legal Scholars - Non-Party Brief)
West Washington Avenue, Suite 900 Madison WI 53701 Joseph S. Goode Laffey, Leitner & Goode LLC 325 E
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/ackfilingbrlegalscholars.pdf - 2022-01-06
West Washington Avenue, Suite 900 Madison WI 53701 Joseph S. Goode Laffey, Leitner & Goode LLC 325 E
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/ackfilingbrlegalscholars.pdf - 2022-01-06