Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3981 - 3990 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3981 - 3990 of 58483 for speedy trial.
State v. John C. Brown
reconsideration of his reconfinement sentence. Brown contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21250 - 2006-03-22
reconsideration of his reconfinement sentence. Brown contends that the trial court erroneously exercised its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21250 - 2006-03-22
[PDF]
State v. John C. Brown
contends that the No. 2005AP584-CR 2 trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21250 - 2017-09-21
contends that the No. 2005AP584-CR 2 trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21250 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Renee D.
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5846 - 2017-09-19
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5846 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Renee D.
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5673 - 2017-09-19
) whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in admitting evidence of the abuse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5673 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jerome Sellars
of convictions entered after a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
of convictions entered after a jury trial for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12792 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Lazorus Lidell appeals from the judgment entered following a bench trial convicting him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48457 - 2014-09-15
. Lazorus Lidell appeals from the judgment entered following a bench trial convicting him of first-degree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48457 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
) the trial court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83527 - 2012-06-11
) the trial court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas; (2) the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83527 - 2012-06-11
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
: (1) the trial court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83527 - 2014-09-15
: (1) the trial court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his guilty pleas; (2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83527 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252152 - 2020-01-14
be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas because he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252152 - 2020-01-14
COURT OF APPEALS
FINE, J. Lazorus Lidell appeals from the judgment entered following a bench trial convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48457 - 2010-03-29
FINE, J. Lazorus Lidell appeals from the judgment entered following a bench trial convicting him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48457 - 2010-03-29