Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 401 - 410 of 83244 for simple case search/1000.
Search results 401 - 410 of 83244 for simple case search/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-7862 Antoine Zebadiah Edwards 528080 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916597 - 2025-02-14
-7862 Antoine Zebadiah Edwards 528080 Wisconsin Secure Program Facility P.O. Box 1000
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=916597 - 2025-02-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was ‘to search said premises or phones for said things’—in this case, child pornography.” ¶38 The State’s focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607580 - 2023-01-05
was ‘to search said premises or phones for said things’—in this case, child pornography.” ¶38 The State’s focus
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=607580 - 2023-01-05
Frontsheet
2015 WI 25 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP2140-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137147 - 2015-03-15
2015 WI 25 Supreme Court of Wisconsin Case No.: 2013AP2140-D Complete Title
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137147 - 2015-03-15
[PDF]
State v. Kelsey C.R.
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case arises out of a stop and pat-down search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17571 - 2017-09-21
of Appeals. Affirmed. ¶1 N. PATRICK CROOKS, J. This case arises out of a stop and pat-down search
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17571 - 2017-09-21
State v. Kelsey C.R.
that she was armed and dangerous. In this case, the search was conducted well before curfew on a person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17571 - 2005-03-31
that she was armed and dangerous. In this case, the search was conducted well before curfew on a person
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17571 - 2005-03-31
State v. Scott A. Flower
. In simple terms, A, B, C and D nowhere lead to X. ¶8 We leave this case by stating the obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21116 - 2006-01-31
. In simple terms, A, B, C and D nowhere lead to X. ¶8 We leave this case by stating the obvious
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21116 - 2006-01-31
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
. NETTESHEIM, J. This is a statute of frauds case. Lyle L. and Dawn Smith appeal from a summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
. NETTESHEIM, J. This is a statute of frauds case. Lyle L. and Dawn Smith appeal from a summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12388 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Lyle L. Smith v. Kenneth J. Bosveld
, JJ. NETTESHEIM, J. This is a statute of frauds case. Lyle L. and Dawn Smith appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
, JJ. NETTESHEIM, J. This is a statute of frauds case. Lyle L. and Dawn Smith appeal from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12388 - 2017-09-21
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
2004 WI App 178 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
2004 WI App 178 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6980 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Robert A. Ragsdale
2004 WI App 178 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20
2004 WI App 178 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 03-2795-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6980 - 2017-09-20