Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40031 - 40040 of 75054 for judgment for us.
Search results 40031 - 40040 of 75054 for judgment for us.
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: JAMES L. CARLSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16010 - 2005-03-31
from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: JAMES L. CARLSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16010 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
The Estate of Martha Burgess v. Carl Peterson
Ralph nor Edna negligent. The Burgess estate appealed the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
Ralph nor Edna negligent. The Burgess estate appealed the judgment entered on the jury’s verdict. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10853 - 2017-09-20
Village of Walworth v. Ryan S. Wood
from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: JAMES L. CARLSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-06-22
from a judgment of the circuit court for Walworth County: JAMES L. CARLSON, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16011 - 2005-06-22
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. Strand
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Eau Claire
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3906 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Gerald Witkowski v. Barry Weber
and implemented. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Chief Weber and the City. Witkowski and Scott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15472 - 2017-09-21
and implemented. The circuit court granted summary judgment to Chief Weber and the City. Witkowski and Scott
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15472 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Marquette County: RICHARD O. WRIGHT, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90612 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Robert P. Hinchey
, V. ROBERT P. HINCHEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5930 - 2017-09-19
, V. ROBERT P. HINCHEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. APPEAL from judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5930 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
WI 36
by reviewing the rulemaking process, JCRAR’s authority, and the contested administrative rules before us. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980186 - 2025-07-08
by reviewing the rulemaking process, JCRAR’s authority, and the contested administrative rules before us. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980186 - 2025-07-08
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
of summary judgment in favor of the Racine Unified School District (the District).[1] Kierstyn argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17271 - 2005-03-31
of summary judgment in favor of the Racine Unified School District (the District).[1] Kierstyn argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17271 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
John G. Kierstyn v. Racine Unified School District
that affirmed the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Racine Unified School District
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17271 - 2017-09-21
that affirmed the circuit court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Racine Unified School District
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17271 - 2017-09-21