Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 29928 for des.
Search results 4041 - 4050 of 29928 for des.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a directed verdict is subject to this court’s de novo review. See Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis. 2d 445, 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07
for a directed verdict is subject to this court’s de novo review. See Millonig v. Bakken, 112 Wis. 2d 445, 450
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=736829 - 2023-12-07
COURT OF APPEALS
this court decides de novo. Id. To prevail, the defendant must show both that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46549 - 2010-02-02
this court decides de novo. Id. To prevail, the defendant must show both that counsel’s performance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=46549 - 2010-02-02
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Brown, C.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=57439 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 65
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95672 - 2014-09-15
as a matter of law.” WIS. STAT. RULE 802.08(2). We review de novo a circuit court’s ruling on summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95672 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
642. No. 2015AP2116 6 statutory interpretation de novo, seeking “to determine what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174392 - 2017-09-19
642. No. 2015AP2116 6 statutory interpretation de novo, seeking “to determine what
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=174392 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
the same methodology as the circuit court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73057 - 2011-11-02
the same methodology as the circuit court, and we consider the issues de novo. Green Spring Farms v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=73057 - 2011-11-02
2008 WI APP 114
summary judgment de novo, without deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Lyons, 207 Wis. 2d at 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33185 - 2011-06-14
summary judgment de novo, without deference to the trial court’s conclusions. Lyons, 207 Wis. 2d at 458
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33185 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
State v. Miya L.A.
N.W.2d 227, 232 (1989). Interpretation of this statute is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11088 - 2017-09-19
N.W.2d 227, 232 (1989). Interpretation of this statute is a question of law subject to de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11088 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 Patrick Wiegel appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31311 - 2014-09-15
for Grant County: ROBERT P. VAN DE HEY, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 VERGERONT, J.1 Patrick Wiegel appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31311 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Kelvin Griffin
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Further, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19
and prejudicial” de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis.2d at 127-28, 449 N.W.2d at 848. Further, we review the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8573 - 2017-09-19