Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40421 - 40430 of 44730 for part.
Search results 40421 - 40430 of 44730 for part.
City of Waupaca v. Mark D. Javorski
that the results of a blood test which comprised part of the evidence underlying his conviction should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8913 - 2005-03-31
that the results of a blood test which comprised part of the evidence underlying his conviction should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8913 - 2005-03-31
State v. Daniel Rodriguez
the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 754-55. They relied in part upon the gravity of the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3047 - 2005-03-31
the Fourth Amendment. Id. at 754-55. They relied in part upon the gravity of the underlying offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3047 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
” because the trooper could not remember the precise words Kugler stated as part of this “deflect[ion].” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-16
” because the trooper could not remember the precise words Kugler stated as part of this “deflect[ion].” We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121579 - 2014-09-16
State v. Eric B. Gardner
The statute at issue here provides in pertinent part: 940.25 Injury by intoxicated use of a vehicle. (1) Any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24777 - 2006-05-30
The statute at issue here provides in pertinent part: 940.25 Injury by intoxicated use of a vehicle. (1) Any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24777 - 2006-05-30
[PDF]
County of Walworth v. Dillis V. Allen
a protective order. We held that because the discovery demands Allen made upon the State were not part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6199 - 2017-09-19
a protective order. We held that because the discovery demands Allen made upon the State were not part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6199 - 2017-09-19
State v. Alphonso L. Robinson
a guess on your part, isn’t it, Mr. Robinson? You are speculating, aren’t you, as to why she would say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
a guess on your part, isn’t it, Mr. Robinson? You are speculating, aren’t you, as to why she would say
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2854 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas P. Bourque
of other acts evidence, the court set out a three-part test for the admission of such evidence under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14884 - 2005-03-31
of other acts evidence, the court set out a three-part test for the admission of such evidence under Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14884 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert K.
. § 48.315(1), for a variety of reasons. Section 48.315(1) provides in relevant part: 48.315 Delays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
. § 48.315(1), for a variety of reasons. Section 48.315(1) provides in relevant part: 48.315 Delays
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7669 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
determines is reasonable. The court shall order either or both parties to pay all or any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07
determines is reasonable. The court shall order either or both parties to pay all or any part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102716 - 2013-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Andre L. Avery
to grant a motion for severance of defendants pursuant to § 971.12(3), STATS., which, in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11530 - 2017-09-19
to grant a motion for severance of defendants pursuant to § 971.12(3), STATS., which, in relevant part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11530 - 2017-09-19