Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40441 - 40450 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 40441 - 40450 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
on August 17, 1999. The trial court imposed and stayed a sentence of two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
on August 17, 1999. The trial court imposed and stayed a sentence of two years on each count, to be served
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06
Courtney F. v. Ramiro M.C.
that the trial courts are the arbiters of discovery disputes. See, e.g., Shier v. Freedman, 49 Wis. 2d 41, 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31
that the trial courts are the arbiters of discovery disputes. See, e.g., Shier v. Freedman, 49 Wis. 2d 41, 43
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7032 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel’s failure to obtain and review copies of the recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87554 - 2014-09-15
assistance of counsel based on his trial counsel’s failure to obtain and review copies of the recordings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87554 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a No. 2017AP459-CR 2 new trial. Storm argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206785 - 2018-01-09
and an order denying his postconviction motion for a No. 2017AP459-CR 2 new trial. Storm argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=206785 - 2018-01-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
In addition to Kathleen and Joseph, the only other witness called at trial was an engineering recruiter who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158694 - 2017-09-21
In addition to Kathleen and Joseph, the only other witness called at trial was an engineering recruiter who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=158694 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
so that he may be resentenced before a different judge. Sprague argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=959098 - 2025-05-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. During a jury trial in April 2023, the jury found that both alleged grounds existed and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733399 - 2023-11-28
. During a jury trial in April 2023, the jury found that both alleged grounds existed and the court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=733399 - 2023-11-28
[PDF]
NOTICE
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
to withdraw his pleas.1 Castaneda argues that he should be allowed to withdraw his pleas because trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Brief per CTO of 10-14-2021 (Evers)
panel found that "[t]he evidence at trial establishes that one purpose of Act 43 was to secure
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctoevers.pdf - 2021-10-25
panel found that "[t]he evidence at trial establishes that one purpose of Act 43 was to secure
/courts/supreme/origact/docs/briefctoevers.pdf - 2021-10-25
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - March 2008
its claimed constitutional right to a jury trial on damages in violation of Art. 1, Sec. 5
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32009 - 2014-09-15
its claimed constitutional right to a jury trial on damages in violation of Art. 1, Sec. 5
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32009 - 2014-09-15