Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40461 - 40470 of 68274 for did.
Search results 40461 - 40470 of 68274 for did.
Melvin A. Neuman v. Circuit Court for Marathon County
certificate under § 69.12, Stats.[2] He presented evidence that Carol did not have ovarian cancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15265 - 2005-03-31
certificate under § 69.12, Stats.[2] He presented evidence that Carol did not have ovarian cancer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15265 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
did engage in a colloquy with Perriona and found that Perriona’s waiver was freely, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108747 - 2014-03-03
did engage in a colloquy with Perriona and found that Perriona’s waiver was freely, voluntarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108747 - 2014-03-03
[PDF]
Dairy Farm Leasing Company, Inc. v. Dean Wink
cow in the herd that did not have an ear tag. The court was not required to accept the auditor's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10942 - 2017-09-20
cow in the herd that did not have an ear tag. The court was not required to accept the auditor's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10942 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 980.01(6)(a) (1995-96), and did not require him to register as a sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 980.01(6)(a) (1995-96), and did not require him to register as a sex offender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33698 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
hearing. The court did not award Henry lost income for attending the March restitution hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
hearing. The court did not award Henry lost income for attending the March restitution hearing because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=718811 - 2023-10-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. § 971.11,2 contends the court did not appropriately exercise its discretion when determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
. § 971.11,2 contends the court did not appropriately exercise its discretion when determining whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=983337 - 2025-07-16
COURT OF APPEALS
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
countered that the deed did not specify the property was donated for a special purpose. It argued
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34045 - 2008-09-15
Margaret Laubert v. Michael G. Mallek
therefore existed. ¶11 Mallek contends that an enforceable contract did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
therefore existed. ¶11 Mallek contends that an enforceable contract did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17961 - 2005-05-03
COURT OF APPEALS
of the victim; and (2) that the person did so intentionally. See Wis. Stat. § 940.01(1) (2011-12).[1] A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117569 - 2014-07-21
of the victim; and (2) that the person did so intentionally. See Wis. Stat. § 940.01(1) (2011-12).[1] A person
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117569 - 2014-07-21
Lucy A. Goebel v. Henry S. Goebel
by the Court.” ¶5 Henry did not make any of the payments ordered in the judgment. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31
by the Court.” ¶5 Henry did not make any of the payments ordered in the judgment. After a hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15137 - 2005-03-31