Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40471 - 40480 of 68246 for law.

State v. David J. Wolfe
. Id. Deficient performance is limited to situations where the law or duty is so clear that reasonable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2832 - 2008-06-25

CA Blank Order
114 Milwaukee, WI 53233 Michael J. Backes Law Offices of Michael J. Backes P.O. Box 11048 Shorewood
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146852 - 2015-08-18

Susann M. Vander Wielen v. Ronald E. Van Asten
. Long Law Office, Appleton. 2005 WI App 220 COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19710 - 2005-10-27

[PDF] Leslie J. Schatz v. Gary R. McCaughtry
a question of law, which we review de novo. State v. Setagord, 211 Wis. 2d 397, 405-06, 565 N.W.2d 506
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3756 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Jarmal Nelson
determination was made upon the facts of record and in reliance on the appropriate and applicable law.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17755 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
called law enforcement because A.B.’s “condition just wasn’t normal,” she was “very disoriented
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1033536 - 2025-11-06

Gregory T. Ross v. Specialty Risk Consultants, Inc.
are in dispute and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See Wis. Stat. § 802.08(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2134 - 2005-03-31

State v. Barbara A. Buettner
of law, which we review de novo. See Gloria A. v. State, 195 Wis.2d 268, 272, 536 N.W.2d 396, 398 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12348 - 2005-03-31

State v. Daniel D. King
a rape-shield-law objection as to whether Shelia J. was “turning tricks” that night. See Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19747 - 2005-10-27

State v. Ralph D. Smythe
the relevant facts, (2) applied a proper standard of law, and (3) used a demonstrative rational process
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17320 - 2005-03-31