Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Search results 4051 - 4060 of 82613 for case codes/1000.
Town of Cedarburg v. Thomas Shewczyk
. In this case, the CUP was a special limited conditional use permit under sec. 10-1-11 of the Town’s zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5110 - 2005-03-31
. In this case, the CUP was a special limited conditional use permit under sec. 10-1-11 of the Town’s zoning code
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5110 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Town of Cedarburg v. Thomas Shewczyk
to enact its CUP under the Zoning Chapter of its Code of Ordinances. In this case, the CUP was a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5110 - 2017-09-19
to enact its CUP under the Zoning Chapter of its Code of Ordinances. In this case, the CUP was a special
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5110 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., ¶15 (emphasis added). Case law recognizes “that a major purpose of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. ATCP 132
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134905 - 2017-09-21
., ¶15 (emphasis added). Case law recognizes “that a major purpose of WIS. ADMIN. CODE ch. ATCP 132
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134905 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
added). · Case law recognizes “that a major purpose of Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 132
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134905 - 2015-02-11
added). · Case law recognizes “that a major purpose of Wis. Admin. Code ch. ATCP 132
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=134905 - 2015-02-11
COURT OF APPEALS
). ¶7 At issue in this case are two areas of exemption: “sales for resale” and sales to tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
). ¶7 At issue in this case are two areas of exemption: “sales for resale” and sales to tax
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107543 - 2014-01-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and the 2011-12 version. Therefore, we rely on the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107543 - 2017-09-21
in this case, and the 2011-12 version. Therefore, we rely on the 2011-12 version. No. 2013AP818
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107543 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Scott F. Frohwirth v. Stephen Puckett
with No. 00-0242 2 supervision (medium-out) to medium security. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 302.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2192 - 2017-09-19
with No. 00-0242 2 supervision (medium-out) to medium security. See WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 302.12(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2192 - 2017-09-19
James C. Dillard, Sr. v. Gary R. McCaughtry
. At the time Dillard’s conduct report was issued, Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.12 provided: “[a]ny inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4857 - 2005-03-31
. At the time Dillard’s conduct report was issued, Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.12 provided: “[a]ny inmate who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4857 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, recruiting materials and symbols violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.20 (Group Resistance) and § DOC 303.47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33345 - 2014-09-15
, recruiting materials and symbols violated WIS. ADMIN. CODE § DOC 303.20 (Group Resistance) and § DOC 303.47
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33345 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and symbols violated Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.20 (Group Resistance) and § DOC 303.47 (Possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33345 - 2008-07-09
and symbols violated Wis. Admin. Code § DOC 303.20 (Group Resistance) and § DOC 303.47 (Possession
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33345 - 2008-07-09