Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 40501 - 40510 of 59033 for do.
Search results 40501 - 40510 of 59033 for do.
COURT OF APPEALS
in prosecutorial misconduct. The inconsistencies in the officers’ statements do not show that the officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77320 - 2012-01-30
in prosecutorial misconduct. The inconsistencies in the officers’ statements do not show that the officers did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=77320 - 2012-01-30
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of its complaint. I do not consider this narrative because it is unsupported by citation to the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846891 - 2024-09-06
of its complaint. I do not consider this narrative because it is unsupported by citation to the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=846891 - 2024-09-06
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
several extensions to do so—Phelps’ counsel moved to dismiss the appeal so Phelps could proceed pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
several extensions to do so—Phelps’ counsel moved to dismiss the appeal so Phelps could proceed pro se
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=948761 - 2025-04-29
State v. Kenneth F. Krantz
Street. The trial court stated: “Even though they do it by reference, I don’t have any problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9499 - 2005-03-31
Street. The trial court stated: “Even though they do it by reference, I don’t have any problem
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9499 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
own doing. He could have simply moved for summary disposition after the State conceded error in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35830 - 2009-03-09
own doing. He could have simply moved for summary disposition after the State conceded error in its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35830 - 2009-03-09
[PDF]
State v. Curtis L. Golston
, Golston raises procedural defects or substantive issues that do not bear upon substantial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10483 - 2017-09-20
, Golston raises procedural defects or substantive issues that do not bear upon substantial rights
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10483 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
injuries. We do not find that argument persuasive. The teacher testified under oath as to what his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90260 - 2014-09-15
injuries. We do not find that argument persuasive. The teacher testified under oath as to what his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=90260 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
is unconstitutionally vague. ¶6 We do not address Beckwith’s claims of error because we conclude that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
is unconstitutionally vague. ¶6 We do not address Beckwith’s claims of error because we conclude that, even
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31751 - 2008-02-06
COURT OF APPEALS
led to his injuries. We do not find that argument persuasive. The teacher testified under oath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
led to his injuries. We do not find that argument persuasive. The teacher testified under oath
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90260 - 2012-12-11
COURT OF APPEALS
in any respect, and we do not consider it. A court need not grant an evidentiary hearing on a legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17
in any respect, and we do not consider it. A court need not grant an evidentiary hearing on a legally
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35558 - 2009-02-17